Use of organic fertilizers in solar photo-Fenton process as potential technology to remove pineapple processing wastewater in Costa Rica

Background: This work studied the use of the organic fertilizers DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe as iron chelates for solar driven photo-Fenton process at natural pH. This process was proposed to investigate its performance on removing a mixture of agrochemicals (propiconazole, imidacloprid and diuron) from pineapple processing wastewater to obtain a suitable effluent to be reused in the agricultural sector. Methods: Experiments were carried out in a solar simulator with a stirred cylindric photoreactor, with a volume of 150 mL and controlled temperature (20°C). The first set of experiments was carried out with ultrapure water to determine optimal iron and H 2O 2 concentrations. The second was performed with simulated wastewater of pineapple processing. Results: The optimized operational conditions for both iron complexes were 10 mg L -1 of Fe (III) and 25 mg L -1 of H 2O 2, since more than 80% of micropollutants (MP) (at an initial concentration of 1 mg L -1 of each compound) were removed in only 20 min with both DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe. The effect of organic matter and inorganic salts on radicals scavenging and chelates stability was also investigated in the experiments performed with synthetic pineapple processing wastewater. The results disclosed differences depending on the iron complex. Nitrites were the principal component influencing the tests carried out with EDDS-Fe. While carbonates at low concentration only significantly affected the experiments performed with DTPA-Fe, they were the major influence on the MPs removal efficiency decrease. In contrast, the presence of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ only influence on this last one. Finally, the results of phytotoxicity disclosed the suitability of treated effluent to be reused in the agricultural sector. Conclusions: This work demonstrated that solar powered photo-Fenton catalysed by iron fertilizer EDDS is a suitable technology for depolluting water streams coming from pineapple processing plants at circumneutral pH, and its subsequent reuse for crop irrigation.


Plain language summary
Some of the main water uses and waste generation points associated with the pineapple industry include the washing steps for raw produce.Wastewater characteristics are the wide wastewater volume and the significant concentration of agrochemicals.Solar-driven photo-Fenton process is considered one of the most effective treatments for the removal of organic contaminants, like pesticides, from wastewaters.However, the low pH required to support the Fenton reaction (optimum pH of 2.8) represents an important limitation for its application to different nearly neutral effluents.To overcome the narrow pH operation range, chelating agents have been employed to keep iron complexed, thus preventing its precipitation.Several of these organic chelating agents are approved by the European Commission (2003) to be used as fertilizers.This work studied the use of the organic fertilizers DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe as iron chelates for solar-driven photo-Fenton process at natural pH.This process was proposed to investigate its performance on removing a mixture of agrochemicals (propiconazole, imidacloprid and diuron) from simulated pineapple processing wastewater to obtain an effluent suitable for reuse in the agricultural sector.

Introduction
Worldwide agricultural production is dependent on the use of agrochemicals to support human population needs (Carvalho, 2006).Despite the benefits derived from the use of pesticides at agricultural level, several adverse consequences, mostly related to environmental contamination, are linked to this practice (Aktar et al., 2009).
Pineapple represents a major crop in Costa Rica; its production covers an area of 58,442 Ha (by 2015), mostly distributed in the lowlands of the northern and Caribbean regions, as well as in the south Pacific coast of the country (Brenes-Alfaro et al., 2021;MINAE, 2015).Moreover, Costa Rica is the largest exporter of fresh pineapple worldwide, with a production estimated to account for 1.7% of the GDP of the country (Chen et al., 2020).However, concern has been raised around the impacts of pineapple production, particularly regarding the large amount of plant waste produced and the hazard due to pesticide use (Chen et al., 2020;Echeverría-Sáenz et al., 2012).Recent monitoring (2015)(2016)(2017)(2018) of surface water and groundwater in areas of pineapple production influence in Costa Rica revealed the occurrence of 28 different pesticides, including herbicides (ametryn, bromacil, diuron, hexazinone, prometryn, paraquat), fungicides (carbendazim, metalaxyl, myclobutanil, paclobutrazol, procloraz, propiconazole, thiabendazole, triadimefon, triadimenol), and insecticides (carbofuran, carbaryl, cyromazine, chlorpyrifos, dichlorvos, diazinon, dimethoate, ethoprophos, imidacloprid, malathion, methoxyfenozide, oxamyl, imazalil, imidacloprid) (unpublished data, Research Center of Environmental Contamination, CICA, Universidad de Costa Rica); of these agrochemicals, 16 are indeed approved for application on pineapple crops, while for instance, bromacil was completely banned in Costa Rica in 2017 (decreet N° 40423-MAG-MINAE-S; La Gaceta, 2017) due to its systematic detection during the monitoring, particularly in groundwater.Among these pesticides, diuron, imidacloprid and propiconazole have been frequently detected in the monitoring; moreover, diuron and propiconazole were also found in sediments, while imidacloprid was also detected in groundwater (unpublished data, Research Center of Environmental Contamination, CICA, Universidad de Costa Rica).These three pesticides are also simultaneously approved for use in other crops, including banana and plantain, not only in Costa Rica (SFE, 2022) but also at other latitudes, such as in Bolivia (Bickel, 2018).Diuron is a phenylurea pre-emergence herbicide, considered as persistent in soil due to its high DT50 of 147-229 d (Lewis et al., 2016).Its ecotoxicity is considered as moderate to typical taxa (birds, fish, daphnids, bees and earthworms), both at acute and chronic levels; specific effects on non-target communities are reviewed by Giacomazzi and Cochet (2004).Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid insecticide, known to adversely affect pollinator communities; for this reason, it was banned in the European Union in 2018 for use in crops pollinated by bees (Declan, 2018); nonetheless, this compound is still extensively used elsewhere.It is a persistent compound, with a soil DT50 of 174-91 d; besides, its acute contact and oral toxicity towards bees, and ecotoxicity towards birds is also described as high (Lewis et al., 2016).On the other hand, propiconazole is a triazole fungicide; as most triazoles, this is a moderate to persistent pesticide, with a soil DT50 of 35-72 d (Lewis et al., 2016).High ecotoxicity of this compound has been described at chronic level in fish.
Several of these organic chelating agents are approved by the European Commission (2003) to be used as fertilizers, as their-ferric chelates can be applied as iron sources to crops for enzymatic and chlorophyl production purposes.Therefore, their use in the treatment of pesticide-containing wastewater of agricultural origin could result in the production of safe treated water for irrigation with no need for chelate separation (López-Vinent et al., 2020).Among these compounds, EDDS is a structural isomer of EDTA; however, as it exhibits higher biodegradability, it is considered as an environmentally safe alternative to EDTA (Wu et al., 2014).Due to its low stability constant with iron, its use in photo-Fenton reactions is expected to result in high initial removal rates, but also, adversely, in rapid iron precipitation which might hinder its global efficiency (López-Vinent et al., 2021a).Conversely, DTPA, another authorized fertilizer, is known to produce highly stable DTPA-iron complexes compared to other organic chelating agents (including EDDS), which translates into slower removal rates, but also in lower residual iron precipitation after treatment (López-Vinent et al., 2020).
Hence, the goal of this work was to compare the effect of two chelating agents used as fertilizers, DTPA and EDDS, on the simultaneous removal of diuron, imidacloprid and propiconazole from synthetic wastewater, by a solar-driven photo-Fenton process, as an eco-friendly solution to produce reusable water for on-farm irrigation.The proposed strategy represents a green option treatment, given that: i. it relies on solar light and the use of hydrogen peroxide, a cheap and "clean" reagent that is transformed into water and molecular oxygen; ii. it permits the treatment of pesticide-containing effluents at normal near-neutral pH, that is, the acidification of a regular homogeneous Fenton is not required; and iii. the residual chelating agents have fertilizer properties and may enhance farm production after treated water is reused in irrigation.

Experimental procedure
All experiments were carried out in a solar simulator (Xenonterm-1500RF.CCI) equipped with a Xenon lamp (1.5 kW) (wavelength range: 290-400 nm).The average intensity of incident light was measured with a spectrometer StellarNet Blue-Wave and set to 10 W m -2 for all the experiments.The cylindric photoreactor (4.5 cm height × 9 cm diameter) was located on a magnetic stirrer in the solar simulator.The total volume of each experiment was 150 mL, and the tests were performed at controlled temperature in the solar simulator chamber (20°C).The evaporation was measured during the entire experiment resulting in less than 1% of the total volume.More information about the experimental set-up can be found in Figure 1.
To prepare the dissolution with the iron chelate DTPA-Fe, an appropriate amount of it was added to Milli-Q water.The concentrations were calculated according to the percentage of iron content (7%) in order to obtain concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 mg L -1 of iron in solution.The molar ratio of DTPA:Fe was 1.5:1.In the mixture with EDDS, which was not acquired as iron chelate, the same molar ratio than DTPA:Fe was selected.In this case, the EDDS was firstly added to the solution and then the iron, to ensure a good chelation and avoid iron precipitation.The obtained solution was then added in appropriate amounts to Milli-Q water in order to obtain the defined iron concentrations (i.e.2.5, 5, 10 mg L -1 ).IMID, DIU and PROP were spiked to the solution to obtain a concentration of 1 mg L -1 of each compound (totalizing 3 mg L -1 ).Finally, hydrogen peroxide (50 mg L -1 ) was added in appropriate concentrations (15, 25 and 50 mg L -1 ) in order to begin the reaction.Samples of 1 mL were retired periodically from the reactor during 60 min and liver bovine catalase was employed to stop the reaction (10 μL of liver bovine catalase at a concentration of 200 mg L -1 to 1 mL of each sample).The samples to analyze the total iron content (i.e. one at the beginning and one at the end of the reaction) were filtered with 0.22 μm PVDF filter to ensure a good read of soluble (chelated and not) iron.Finally, ascorbic acid was added to the sample to have the total soluble iron.

Analytical techniques
The concentration of the three pesticides (IMID, DIU and PROP) was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC Infinity Series, Agilent Technologies), using a C-18 Tecknokroma column (250 × 4.6 mm i. d; 5 μm particle size).The HPLC mobile phases A and D were water acidified with orthophosphoric acid (pH = 3) and acetonitrile, respectively.The mobile phase eluent gradient started with 45% eluent D for 5 min, followed by a 1-min linear gradient to 60% D. This condition (60% D) was kept for 16 min, followed by a 1-min gradient back to 45% D, maintained for 5 min.The flow rate was 1 mL min -1 and the injection volume was set to 100 μL.Three wavelengths were fixed according to the absorbance of each compound: 200, 247 and 270 nm for PROP, DIU and IMID, respectively.The monitoring of H 2 O 2 and total iron in solution were performed by colorimetric method of metavanadate (Pupo Nogueira et al., 2005) and o-phenanthroline procedure (ISO 6332), respectively.To determine the phytotoxicity, the methodology proposed by Tam and Tiquia (Tam & Tiquia, 1994) was followed using seeds of Eruca sativa.

Determination of effective H 2 O 2 and Fe(III) concentrations
The optimal conditions for simultaneous abatement of the three target micropollutants (IMID, DIU and PROP) by neutral photo-Fenton process was studied by performing such a process at different initial concentrations of Fe and H 2 O 2 , and with two Fe-chelating agents (DTPA and EDDS).The pH of the solution was between 5.5-6.5 during the entire experiment and the tests were carried out in ultrapure water.The results are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 4, for DTPA and EDDS, respectively.Additionally, Figure 3 and Figure 5 gather the observed pseudo-first order kinetics for each experiment.The photolysis was also studied for the three micropollutants.The removal results of that test at the end of the experiment (60 min) were: 4.8, 5.1 and 6.1% for IMID, DIU and PROP, respectively.All experiments were performed in triplicate.
From the results displayed in Figure 2 a-c, it can be observed that the worst removals were observed with the lowest Fe concentration (2.5 mg L -1 ).With this test, total MP removal at the end of the treatment was not achieved.The best removal rate was seen on DIU, of which about 90% were removed at 60 min.The best MP degradations for three MPs were achieved by the highest iron dose (10 mg L -1 ).For instance, DIU was degraded 99% in only 20 min.These two experiments were performed with the same H 2 O 2 concentration, so, the results revealed the importance of the iron concentration to achieve fast kinetics of MPs removal.For example, in the case of DIU, the removal kinetic (k1, see Figure 3a) was 5.7 times higher using 10 than 2.5 mg L -1 of iron.
Regarding the experiments performed with the same concentration of iron (5 mg L -1 ) but different H 2 O 2 concentrations, it could be observed in Figure 2 a-c, that the best condition was with 50 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 , which was the highest one.Nevertheless, the differences in MPs removal between the three experiments were lower than the tests aforementioned (same H 2 O 2 , different iron concentration).The greatest difference was observed in the removal of IMID.About 90% of IMID degradation was obtained at 60 min for the conditions with low H 2 O 2 concentration (5 mg L -1 of Fe and 15 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 ), against 99% with high H 2 O 2 dose (5 mg L -1 of Fe and 50 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 ); however, IMID degraded just 1.2 times faster (see Figure 3a, k1) than in the experiment with the lowest H 2 O 2 concentration.These results evidenced again the importance of the iron concentration in the photo-Fenton experiments, since by increasing the H 2 O 2 concentration 3.3 times, the kinetic rate only was 1.2 times higher.However, increasing the iron concentration four times, the kinetic rate increased 5.7 times.The results are in accordance with the study performed by López-Vinent and co-authors (López-Vinent et al., 2019).In that work, by increasing the iron concentration four times, total MP removal was achieved at 20 min while only 60% removal was obtained with the low iron concentration.Nevertheless, with the same iron dose but increasing the H 2 O 2 concentration six times, similar removal rates were seen at the end of the treatment.
Concerning the differences in MP removal, it can be observed that IMID presented the lowest removal rates in all conditions.The best degradations were achieved for DIU.For instance, observing the experiment (Figure 2a-c) performed with 5 mg L -1 of Fe and 15 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 , it could be noted that at 30 min 78% of IMID was eliminated, while 94% and 90% was obtained for DIU and PROP.The results obtained for DIU are in accordance with its kinetic constant with hydroxyl radical (4.75 × 10 9 M -1 s -1 ) (Oturan et al., 2011), which is the highest one.Nevertheless, PROP presents the lowest kinetic constant (3.3 × 10 9 M -1 s -1 ) (Hong et al., 2022) but the removal was similar  to DIU.That fact could evidence the potential generation of other reactive oxygen species (ROS) apart from the formation of hydroxyl radicals, since the photolysis was similar for three MPs.On the other hand, IMID had a kinetic constant of 4.30 x 10 9 M -1 s -1 (Zaror et al., 2010) but, as aforementioned, the lowest removals.
All these experiments were also performed using EDDS as an iron chelate.From several investigations it was revealed the differences on MPs removal using different iron complexes like EDDS, DTPA, HEDTA, EDDHA (López-Vinent et al., 2021a;Nahim-Granados et al., 2019).From the study of López-Vinent and coworkers (López-Vinent et al., 2021a) it was revealed that the removal kinetics are linked to the stability of the chelating agent with iron.For this reason, in this work two iron chelates were tested since they present different stability with iron (k stab DTPA-Fe(III)= 28.60 and k stab EDDS-Fe(III)= 22.0) (López-Vinent et al., 2021a) The results are displayed in Figure 3a-c.
As can be observed in Figure 4a-c, a similar trend was seen using EDDS and DTPA for experiments using different iron concentrations but equal H 2 O 2 doses.Observing Figure 3a (which corresponds to the removal of IMID), since it is the one that presents the highest differences between the experiments, the test using the lowest iron concentration (2.5 mg L -1 ) achieved lower IMID removal than the experiment using 10 mg L -1 of Fe.However, in that case the kinetic (see Figure 5a, k1) was only 1.4 times higher with 10 mg L -1 than 2.5 mg L -1 of Fe.Thus, the improvement on MP removal with increased iron concentration was lower using EDDS than DTPA, with the increment being 5.7 times higher with 10 mg L -1 than 2.5 mg L -1 of iron.
In general, the differences between experimental conditions with EDDS were very low, being practically equal in the removal of PROP and DIU.This fact could be related to the high degradation kinetics during the first 15 min of the reaction.Curiously, after these 15 min, a plateau of the curve was observed in the removal of IMID and PROP.In almost all cases, total DIU was removed at 15 min.The plateauing degradation could be related to the high consumption of H 2 O 2 in the first 20 min.Between 50-80% of the total H 2 O 2 was consumed at that time, leading to a limiting step in the oxidation and decreasing the generation of hydroxyl radicals.
From the results displayed in Figure 2-Figure 5, it can be observed that the experiments carried out with EDDS, the observed kinetics at initial times (k1) were always higher than the experiments using DTPA.For instance, IMID was degraded at about 80% in only 15 minutes with EDDS using 2.5 mg L -1 of Fe and 25 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 ; however, while employing the same conditions, less than 30% was degraded using DTPA.The same results were obtained in diverse studies performed by López-Vinent and colleagues (López-Vinent et al., 2020;López-Vinent et al., 2021a;López-Vinent et al., 2021b).These differences could be related to the consumption of H 2 O 2 , which always was higher in the experiments performed with EDDS than DTPA.The results are displayed in Figure 6.The high H 2 O 2 consumption leads to the high production of hydroxyl radicals and subsequent oxidation of MPs.This fact is also related to the stability of chelating agents with iron (III).DTPA presents a higher stability constant with iron than EDDS.Lower stability allows a high reaction between iron and H 2 O 2 , increasing the hydroxyl radical production.However, because of that, the iron precipitation was higher in the experiments performed with EDDS-Fe.The low stability of EDDS with iron allowed high MP removal rates in a few minutes and it diminished the requirement of high doses of iron and H 2 O 2 .Nevertheless, the higher iron precipitation with EDDS than DTPA caused the formation of oxohydroxides, which are not soluble and less photoactive than dissolved iron.This decreased the efficiency of the treatment, leading to an almost-plateau curve from the 15-minute mark until the end of the treatment, not reaching total MP removal overall in IMID and PROP.
Finally, concerning the differences in the removal kinetic in the first 15 min of the experiments performed with EDDS-Fe and DTPA-Fe, a previous study (López-Vinent et al., 2022) revealed the role of sunlight in the photoexcitation of iron complexes to generate additional ROS without H 2 O 2 in the treatment.Further studies should be performed to confirm the extension of this contribution on the MP removal kinetics observed by DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe.

Influence of components contained in pineapple washing wastewater
As observed in the previous section, iron complexes present different efficiencies in MP removal, which islinked to the constant stability of each chelating agent with iron.It was revealed that EDDS-Fe presented higher kinetics in MPs degradation than DTPA-Fe, but also showed higher iron precipitation.This fact decreases the efficiency of the process due to the low photocatalytic activity.Additionally, its effect could be more noticeable in a complex matrix.For instance, López-Vinent and coworkers (López-Vinent et al., 2021b) investigated the effect of the matrix on iron precipitation and subsequent decrease in MP removal efficiency.In that work it was revealed that the iron precipitation was 1.8 times higher in a complex matrix than another one with low dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and alkalinity.Additionally, the organic matter and alkalinity present in the matrix also compete for hydroxyl radicals, decreasing the efficiency of the MP removal process.
For these reasons, in this work, experiments with synthetic wastewater simulating the pineapple processing wastewater were carried out with both iron complexes, EDDS-Fe and DTPA-Fe using 10 mg L -1 of Fe(III) and 25 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 .The properties of synthetic wastewater were reported in the Methods section.Moreover, experiments testing components separately in deionized water or removing some components of synthetic water, were also performed in order to investigate the effect of each component on the MPs efficiency decrease.The results of MPs removal are displayed in Figure 7 and Figure 8, for DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe, respectively.Additionally, total iron precipitation and H 2 O 2 consumption are shown in Figure 9.
The removal rates found in synthetic water were <5% with DTPA and between 25-45% with EDDS, and both were much lower than with deionized water (>95% for both chelates) for the three MPs (Figure 7 and Figure 8), evidencing the hindering effect of a complex matrix (synthetic water) and the different effect of both chelates on the treatment efficiency.Regarding the experiments removing some of the constituents of synthetic water, the highest removal rates were achieved with deionized water with Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ using EDDS (more than 90% in only 30 min).These removal rates were similar to deionized water, which indicates that Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ did not significantly hinder the treatment efficiency of the photo-Fenton process using EDDS.The experiments performed with DTPA were quite different.Although the tests carried out in deionized water with Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ achieved the best removal rates compared to other experiments, the degradations were not equal to tests without any constituent (in deionized water).For instance, in 20 min, only 65% of PROP was removed in the presence of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+, while more than 90% removal was observed in deionized water.Removing nitrites from the synthetic water improved the efficiency of the treatment with both chelates, although at lower rates for DTPA (removal rates were 20-25% and >90% for DTPA and EDDS, respectively, compared to <5% for DTPA and 25-45% for EDDS both with synthetic water).Thus, the efficiency of the treatment when removing nitrites was improved further to 20-45% for DTPA, maintaining high rates (>90%) for EDDS.However, removing only humic acids from the synthetic water did not seem to affect the efficiency of the treatment (removal rates without humic acids were <5% and 20-40% for DTPA and EDDS, respectively).These results indicate that nitrites had a hindering effect on the efficiency of the treatment which is potentiated in the presence of humic acids.
With regards to the different effects of both chelates, we found that removal of MPs was higher with EDDS than with DTPA (Figure 7 and Figure 8).This difference can be related to the higher consumption of H 2 O 2 with EDDS than DTPA (Figure 9) which has been previously discussed (Determination of effective H2O2 and Fe(III) concentrations section).Briefly, the lower stability of EDDS with iron enables a faster/greater production of hydroxyl radicals, increasing removal rates for the MPs.This would have allowed overcoming the hindering effect observed for some of the synthetic water constituents with DTPA (i.e.synthetic water, nitrites and nitrites potentiated with humic acids, see previous paragraphs).However, we also found that iron was still dissolved and H 2 O 2 has not been completely consumed at the end of the experiments with DTPA (Figure 9).Since MPs exhibited declining trends until the end of the experiments with DTPA, it is likely that the photo-Fenton reaction would have continued after the experiment.This has been observed by Lopez Vinent et al. (2021a), who found that declining of propranolol hydrochloride, acetamiprid and sulfamethoxazole were slower with DTPA than with EDDS, but the dissolved iron and remaining H 2 O 2 with DTPA allowed the reaction to continue until reaching same/higher removal rates than EDDS.Further experiments are required to confirm whether the trends we found with DTPA would allow the reaction to continue.
We also found that the removal rates with deionized water with only carbonates, at a higher concentration (150 mg L -1 ) than in synthetic water, were between 0 and 4% for both chelates, being even lower than with synthetic water.Such low removal rates may be associated to the alkaline pH (i.e.we found pH values >10) resulting from dissolving carbonates, but also to the carbonate anions themselves.High pH values could have produced the dissociation of Fe (III) from the chelates, which is in line with the total iron precipitation we found with DTPA for water with carbonates (Figure 9).Carbonate anions have been shown to interact with iron, generating less reactive species and severely limiting the Fenton process (Vallés et al., 2021).Whichever the mechanism, the effect from carbonates at low concentration (30 mg L -1 ) seemed to disappear in presence of the other constituents of synthetic water using EDDS.But in experiments carried out with DTPA, the negative effect was also observed even at a low concentration of carbonates, since in the tests performed in synthetic water without nitrites and carbonates, the removal rates were lower than experiments in deionized water.Thus, based on our results, nitrites should be removed from pineapple water before the photo-Fenton process using EDDS in order to efficiently reduce the studied MPs.
Finally, phytotoxicity using seeds of E. sativa was also evaluated in the experiments performed with synthetic water and synthetic water without nitrites and humic acids, to assess the suitability of the effluent to be reused in irrigation.The results are displayed in Figure 10.
As can be observed in Figure 10, the germination index (GI) before the treatment (t=0) was about 65-70% in the samples with DTPA.Using EDDS, the germination index was quite lower (about 50%).However, no significant injury to the plant was observed according to Zucconi and coworkers (Zucconi et al., 1981a;Zucconi et al., 1981b)  -Presence of phytotoxicity: 20-50% GI.
Regarding the experiments at the end of the treatment, clear differences were observed between the effluents tested.With synthetic water in both cases, using EDDS or DTPA, the GI decreased compared to the initial time.In that case, the GI dropped by 17% and 10% for DTPA and EDDS, respectively.Nevertheless, that fact was not unexpected, since no removal of MPs was observed using DTPA, or low rates (about 30% removal for each MP) were obtained using EDDS.This fact could be linked to the presence of by-products (Freitas et al., 2017) probably more toxic than the initial MPs, as well as to the transformation products from the iron complexes.The same behavior was observed in the study of López-Vinent and colleagues (López-Vinent et al., 2021b).Concerning the phytotoxicity in synthetic water without nitrites and humic acids, it was observed that the same germination index was obtained at the start and end of the treatment using DTPA (about 70%) which does not imply significant injury to the plant.That fact, in part, could be related to the formation of toxic by-products which decrease the germination index, but could also be linked to the disappearance of the diuron, which is a herbicide.Finally, the results on phytotoxicity in the experiments using EDDS revealed an increase of the germination index at the end of the treatment compared to the initial time, achieving a germination index value of 84%.This value represents a disappearance of the phytotoxicity, according to Zucconi and coworkers.The results are in accordance with the removals of MPs, since at the end of the treatment more than 90% were removed and total diuron degradation was observed in only 20 min.The higher kinetic rates using EDDS than DTPA could imply the removal of the possible by-products formed during the treatment, which results in low phytotoxicity to the seeds.So, this means that the effluent treated with EDDS-Fe would be suitable for reuse in agricultural irrigation without causing any damage to crops.However, it needs more investigation since continued irrigation with traces of diuron, propiconazole or imidacloprid could create resistance to these compounds in crops.

Conclusions
This work demonstrated the suitability of photo-Fenton process at natural pH to remove a mixture of imidacloprid, diuron and propiconazole.The operational conditions were optimized for both iron complexes and the results revealed that high kinetic rates on MP removal were obtained using 10 mg L -1 of Fe(III) and 25 mg L -1 of H 2 O 2 .With these conditions, more than 80% of three micropollutants were removed in only 20 min for both iron complexes.In all cases, experiments using EDDS-Fe achieved higher kinetic rates than DTPA-Fe.These differences could be related to the stability constant of each chelating agent with iron.EDDS presents a lower constant than DTPA, resulting in a high availability of H 2 O 2 and light to react with iron.The differences between them increased in the tests with the lowest iron concentration (2.5 mg L -1 of Fe (III)), revealing that iron concentration is a key parameter on the removal kinetics.In the case of EDDS-Fe the differences between different iron and H 2 O 2 concentration were lower than using DTPA-Fe, which also could be linked to the stability constant of iron complexes.
The efficiency of the photo-Fenton process using synthetic pineapple processing wastewater was also investigated in this work.In this water, the removal of three micropollutants was decreased for both iron complexes compared to the removals obtained using deionized water.No micropollutant removal was achieved using DTPA-Fe and a low degradation was achieved with EDDS-Fe (for instance, only 40% removal of diuron was achieved at 60 min).In this sense, the effect of each component on MP degradation was investigated.The effect of the compounds was different depending on the iron complex used.
Nitrites presented the most influence on EDDS-Fe, while carbonates and humic acids did not affect the MPs degradation.However, in the case of tests performed with DTPA-Fe, a four-time decrease was observed when the water contains carbonates and humic acids compared to the results in deionized water.
In that case, the nitrites did not significantly influence MP removal.On the other hand, the concentration of calcium and magnesium also only affected the test using DTPA-Fe.But in that case, the effect was lower since differences on MP removal rates lower than 20% were observed at the end of the process compared to tests in deionized water.
Finally, phytotoxicity was investigated in the tests performed with synthetic water and synthetic water without nitrites and humic acids.The results revealed that with synthetic water, phytotoxicity was observed (less than 50% of germination index) at the end of the treatment with both iron complexes.However, in the tests carried out in synthetic water without nitrites and humic acids, no significant injury to the plant and disappearance of phytotoxicity were observed in the tests with DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe, respectively.These results disclosed the suitability of treated effluent with EDDS-Fe for reuse in the agricultural sector when the content of nitrites does not compromise MP removal.

Marwa El-Azazy
Qatar University, Doha, Doha, Qatar The current article is addressing the removal of three micropollutants (three pesticides) from pineapple processing water using two organic fertilizers; DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe as iron chelates.
Authors have reported the implementation of the two chelates at near neutral pH for solar-driven photo-Fenton process.Reported findings showed the efficiency of the mentioned approach in pure water with % removal exceeding 80% in a timeframe of 20 min.Yet, interferents diminished the applicability of the proposed approach to synthetic samples.To that end, the article in general is well written, the discussion of the findings is well displayed, and the proposed approach is applicable on the lab scale.Yet, and to improve the quality of the paper, authors need to address the following comments: The title is long and could be shortened.The current title might not be reflecting the removal of the pesticides from the pineapple processing water. 1.
It would be better (and to show the magnitude of the problem) if authors could indicate the concentration levels at which the 28 pesticides were found.

2.
Please check the DT50 of Imidacloprid.

3.
Please show the chemical structure of the three pesticides as well as the chelating agents.4.
Please consider using more recent references in the introduction section. 5.
Authors need to add a table after the introduction section that shows the reported methods for the removal of the three MPs, the reported % removal, what kind of water sample was investigated and the removal conditions (pH, concentrations, etc.) 6.

7.
The sentence "To prepare the dissolution with the iron chelate DTPA-Fe, an appropriate amount of it was added to Milli-Q water" needs clarification.Authors need to either state the 8.
'appropriate amount' or rephrase the sentence and clarify the meaning of the sentence 'To prepare the dissolution'.
Similarly, the next sentence 'The concentrations were calculated according to the percentage of iron content (7%) in order to obtain concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 mg L -1 of iron in solution'.Authors already mentioned that the starting concentration of DTPA-Fe is 7% under the experimental section so no need for repetition to avoid confusion.9.
In the sentence 'In the mixture with EDDS, which was not acquired as iron chelate, the same molar ratio than DTPA: Fe was selected', I think authors meant 'like' rather than 'than'.

10.
Better to use 'withdrawn, drawn, taken out, removed' instead of ''retired' periodically from the reactor during 60 min'.

11.
In the same context, please clarify the time points at which you have withdrawn the samples over the 60 min -e.g., 0, 30 s, 1, 2, … min.

12.
Authors need to justify the use of different concentrations of iron and hydrogen peroxide and the ratio of iron: hydrogen peroxide.

13.
A justification of the different degradation percentages observed among the three MPs based on their chemical structures is needed and would help understanding the degradation mechanism.

14.
Please be consistent in using abbreviations throughout the manuscript text (e.g., minutes and min., K1 and K 1 , etc.).

15.
As shown by the findings in synthetic wastewater, the interferents hindered or diminished the removal of the MPs, an issue which limits the applicability of the proposed approach on a large scale and on real samples.Therefore, authors need to find an alternative approach or work on adjusting the experimental conditions, especially the pH to fit the large-scale application.

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Wastewater treatment, recycling of agro-wastes into value-added products, experimental design I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
In my opinion, the work displays a well-organized structure and features an intriguing comparison between two organic binders utilized in solar Fenton processes.The paper's strength lies in the comprehensive comparison between deionized water and wastewater, as it takes into account numerous variables that exert an influence on the Fenton process.Below, I offer specific suggestions aimed at assisting the authors in enhancing the quality of their paper: I recommend that the authors revise the first sentence of the abstract to enhance its clarity.Proposed revision: "This study explores the application of organic fertilizers, specifically DTPA-Fe and EDDS-Fe, as iron chelates within a solar-driven photo-Fenton process conducted at natural pH." 1.
Within the introduction, it seems appropriate to replace the term "decreet" with "decree." 2.
To ensure verbal consistency, consider modifying the phrase "imidacloprid was also detected in groundwater" to "imidacloprid has also been identified in groundwater" in the introduction.
Within the experimental procedures, kindly specify the distance maintained between the lamp and the sample.

5.
In the results section, make sure to include the definitive article before the abbreviation of 6.
pollutants, which appears to have been omitted in several instances.
The caption for Figure 9 requires adjustment.While the colors correspond to lines, they should align with the histograms.

7.
A sentence on page 11 appears somewhat unclear: "Thus, the efficiency of the treatment when removing nitrites was improved further to 20-45% for DTPA, maintaining high rates (>90%) for EDDS."Consider revising this sentence for greater clarity.Reviewer Expertise: Treatment of civil and industrial wastewater through advanced oxidation and adsorption processes.Drinking water treatment.Removal of emerging contaminants.Environmental impact assessment.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
Reviewer Report 27 September 2022 https://doi.org/10.21956/openreseurope.16212.r30042

Irene Salmeron Garcia
Chair of Urban Water Treatment, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg This manuscript assesses the feasibility of photo-Fenton treatment as an alternative for the removal of three organic pesticides commonly contained in an agro-industrial wastewater.Two different iron sources were studied for the operation at natural pH as well as the influence of the crucial ions and substances present on the matrix.
The work is well structured, well explained and results and discussion are coherent and in line with other works previously reported in literature.However, some minor comments arise and would need to be addressed for the final version of the document.The conclusions seem more a summary of the work done than the main findings obtained from the study.In fact, in conclusions it is stated that photo-Fenton is suitable for the removal of the three MP at near-neutral pH, but this only happened in pure water and not in the case of the synthetic agro-industrial effluent, where only a small ratio of removal was achieved, so probably for that kind of effluents would be better the application of an alternative technology.
Regarding the text, it is reported that the removal kinetics are linked to the stability of the chelating agent with iron.This argument is repeated several times along the text and for an easier understanding and a more friendly reading I would avoid that redundancy.
The implementation of these minor changes would improve the quality of the document.

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Micropollutants removal from wastewater treatment effluents I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Pseudo-first order kinetic of different experimental conditions using DTPA-Fe iron complex.a) k 1 is the kinetic constant at initial times (0-15 min) and b) k 2 is the kinetic from 15-60 min.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Pseudo-first order kinetic of different experimental conditions using EDDS-Fe iron complex.a) k 1 is the kinetic constant at initial times (0-15 min) and b) k 2 is the kinetic from 15-60 min.
in both cases.Zucconi et al. proposed different phytotoxicity categories depending on the inhibition percentage of the GI -Inhibition of seed germination and root elongation: <20% GI.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Phytotoxicity evaluation in effluents at initial and at the end of the photo-Fenton treatment using DTPA and EDDS in synthetic water and synthetic water without nitrites and humic acids.

Reviewer
Report 18 August 2023 https://doi.org/10.21956/openreseurope.16212.r34170© 2023 Fiorentino A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
the authors incorporate a discussion concerning the rationale behind their choice of Iron and Hydrogen Peroxide concentrations 9.Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?YesIs the study design appropriate and does the work have academic merit?YesAre sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?YesIf applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?YesAre all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?YesAre the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?YesCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

of volumetric rate of photon absorption on the kinetics of micropollutant removal by solar photo-Fenton with Fe 3+ -EDDS at neutral pH
.J Chem Eng.2018; 331: 84-92.