Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/104212
Title: Benefit of left atrial roof linear ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized study
Author: Arbelo, Elena
Guiu, Esther
Bisbal, Felipe
Ramos, Pablo
Borràs, Roger
Andreu, David
Tolosana, José María
Berruezo Sánchez, Antonio
Brugada Terradellas, Josep, 1958-
Mont Girbau, Lluís
Keywords: Fibril·lació auricular
Catèters
Malalties del cor
Estudi de casos
Atrial fibrillation
Catheters
Heart diseases
Case studies
Issue Date: 5-Sep-2015
Abstract: Background Isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is often supplemented with linear lesions within the left atrium (LA). However, there are conflicting data on the effects of creating a roof line (RL) joining the superior PVs in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods and Results A cohort of 120 patients with drug-refractory PAF referred for ablation were prospectively randomized into 2 strategies: (1) PV isolation in combination with RL ablation (LA roof ablation [LARA]-1: 59 patients) or (2) PV isolation (LARA-2: 61 patients). Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure and every 6 months thereafter. After a 3-month blanking period, recurrence was defined as the ocurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting ≥30 seconds. PV isolation was achieved in 89% and complete RL block in 81%. RF duration, fluoroscopy, and procedural times were slightly, but not significantly, longer in the LARA-1 group. After 15±10 months, there was no difference in the arrhythmia-free survival after a single AF ablation procedure (LARA-1: 59% vs. LARA-2: 56% at 12 months; log rank P=0.77). The achievement of complete RL block did not influence the results. The incidence of LA macroreentrant tachycardias was 5.1% in the LARA-1 group (n=3) versus 8.2% in the LARA-2 (n=5) (P=ns). Univariate analysis only identified AF duration as a covariate associated with arrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.002 to 1.012]; P<0.01). Conclusion The linear block at the LA roof is not associated with an improved clinical outcome compared with PV isolation alone.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000877
It is part of: Journal Of The American Heart Association, 2015, vol. 3, num. 5, p. 1-12
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000877
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/104212
ISSN: 2047-9980
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
658433.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons