Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/106206
Title: Norms of Judgement, Naturalism, and Normativism about Content
Author: Díaz León, Encarnación
Keywords: Filosofia
Naturalisme
Philosophy
Naturalism
Issue Date: 4-Apr-2016
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Abstract: David Papineau [1999. "Normativity and Judgement." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73 (Sup. Vol.): 16-43.] argues that norms of judgement pose no special problem for naturalism, because all such norms of judgement are derived from moral or personal values. Papineau claims that this account of the normativity of judgement presupposes an account of content that places normativity outside the analysis of content, because in his view any accounts of content that place normativity inside the analysis of content cannot explain the normativity of judgement in the derivative way he proposes. Furthermore, he argues that normative accounts of content along those lines are independently problematic. In this paper I aim to respond to both objections, by arguing that normative accounts of content can be seen as naturalist accounts, even if they place normativity inside the analysis of content; and that normative accounts of content are compatible with a derivative account of norms of judgement of the sort Papineau advocates.
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2016.1124910
It is part of: Philosophical Explorations, 2016, vol. 19, num. 1, p. 48-58
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2016.1124910
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/106206
ISSN: 1386-9795
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
662250.pdf196.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Embargat   Document embargat fins el 4-10-2017


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.