Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/110742
Title: Adherence to capecitabine in preoperative treatment of stage II and III rectal cancer: do we need to worry?
Author: Font, R.
Espinàs Piñol, Josep Alfons
Layos, L.
Martínez Villacampa, Mercedes
Capdevila, J.
Tobeña, M.
Pisa, Aleydis
Pericay, Carles
Lezcano, C.
Fort, E.
Cardona, I.
Berga, N.
Solà, Judit
Borràs Andrés, Josep Maria
Keywords: Oncologia
Malalts de càncer
Càncer colorectal
Barcelona (Catalunya)
Quimioteràpia
Medicaments antineoplàstics
Adherències (Medicina)
Oncology
Cancer patients
Colorectal cancer
Barcelona (Catalonia)
Chemotherapy
Antineoplastic agents
Adhesions
Issue Date: 6-Mar-2017
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract: Background: Preoperative oral capecitabine plus radiotherapy has been progressively adopted in oncology units to provide more convenient care to patients with rectal cancer, but little is known about adherence to this therapy. Patients and methods: Prospective, multicentre observational study in six hospitals in metropolitan Barcelona (Spain), in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer. Assessment of adherence was based on the medical report in the clinical history, a patient questionnaire and a pill count in the pharmacy service upon finalization of treatment. Patients were considered adherent if they had taken 80%-110% of the prescribed treatment. We evaluated clinical variables, adverse effects, anxiety and depression (using the hospital anxiety depression scale [HADS]), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-30). We analysed adherence-associated variables using a logistic regression model and concordance between adherence measures by means of the modified Kappa index. Results: We included 119 participants. Adherence measures showed little concordance between the assessment methods used: adherence was 100% according to the clinical history, 83.2% according to self-report and 67.9% according to the pill count. In the multivariable analysis, the most relevant variable associated with non-adherence was anxiety prior to treatment (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] 6.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-32.7). We did not observe any relevant association between adherence and clinical variables and baseline quality of life parameters. Conclusions: Adherence to short-term oral neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer may be a clinical problem, and it should be acknowledged and systematically evaluated by clinicians during treatment. The limited concordance between different measures of adherence highlights the challenges in monitoring it and the need to use different approaches to assess its impact in clinical practice.
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx006
It is part of: Annals of Oncology, 2017, vol. 28, num. 4, p. 831-835
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx006
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/110742
ISSN: 0923-7534
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
671048.pdf525.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Embargat   Document embargat fins el 6-3-2018


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.