Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/122135
Title: Bias in diet determination: Incorporating traditional methods in Bayesian mixing models
Author: Franco-Trecu, Valentina
Drago, Massimiliano
Riet-Sapriza, Federico G.
Parnell, Andrew
Frau, Rosina
Inchasuti, Pablo
Keywords: Dieta
Predació (Biologia)
Estadística bayesiana
Diet
Predation (Biology)
Bayesian statistical decision
Issue Date: 5-Nov-2013
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Abstract: There are not "universal methods" to determine diet composition of predators. Most traditional methods are biased because of their reliance on differential digestibility and the recovery of hard items. By relying on assimilated food, stable isotope and Bayesian mixing models (SIMMs) resolve many biases of traditional methods. SIMMs can incorporate prior information (i.e. proportional diet composition) that may improve the precision in the estimated dietary composition. However few studies have assessed the performance of traditional methods and SIMMs with and without informative priors to study the predators' diets. Here we compare the diet compositions of the South American fur seal and sea lions obtained by scats analysis and by SIMMs-UP (uninformative priors) and assess whether informative priors (SIMMs-IP) from the scat analysis improved the estimated diet composition compared to SIMMs-UP. According to the SIMM-UP, while pelagic species dominated the fur seal's diet the sea lion's did not have a clear dominance of any prey. In contrast, SIMM-IP's diets compositions were dominated by the same preys as in scat analyses. When prior information influenced SIMMs' estimates, incorporating informative priors improved the precision in the estimated diet composition at the risk of inducing biases in the estimates. If preys isotopic data allow discriminating preys' contributions to diets, informative priors should lead to more precise but unbiased estimated diet composition. Just as estimates of diet composition obtained from traditional methods are critically interpreted because of their biases, care must be exercised when interpreting diet composition obtained by SIMMs-IP. The best approach to obtain a near-complete view of predators' diet composition should involve the simultaneous consideration of different sources of partial evidence (traditional methods, SIMM-UP and SIMM-IP) in the light of natural history of the predator species so as to reliably ascertain and weight the information yielded by each method.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080019
It is part of: PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, num. 11, p. 1-8
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/122135
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080019
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
671026.pdf627.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons