Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/123028
Title: Costimulation blockade with Belatacept in renal transplantation
Author: Vincenti, Flavio
Larsen, Christian
Durrbach, Antoine
Wekerle, Thomas
Nashan, Björn
Blancho, Gilles
Lang, Philippe
Grinyó Boira, Josep M.
Halloran, Philip F.
Solez, Kim
Hagerty, David
Levy, Elliott
Zhou, Wenjiong
Natarajan, Kannan
Charpentier, Bernard
Belatacept Study Group
Keywords: Malalties del ronyó
Antígens
Trasplantament renal
Immunosupressors
Rebuig (Biologia)
Kidney diseases
Antigens
Kidney transplantation
Immunosupressive agents
Graft rejection
Issue Date: 25-Aug-2005
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Abstract: Background: Renal transplantation is the standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors yields excellent one-year survival, it is associated over the long term with high rates of death and graft loss, owing in part to the adverse renal, cardiovascular, and metabolic effects of these agents. The use of potentially less toxic agents, such as belatacept, a selective blocker of T-cell activation, may improve outcomes. Methods: We randomly assigned renal-transplant recipients to receive an intensive or a less-intensive regimen of belatacept or cyclosporine. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of belatacept over cyclosporine in the incidence of acute rejection at six months (with an upper bound of the 95 percent confidence interval around the treatment difference of less than 20 percent). Results: At six months, the incidence of acute rejection was similar among the groups: 7 percent for intensive belatacept, 6 percent for less-intensive belatacept, and 8 percent for cyclosporine. At 12 months, the glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher with both intensive and less-intensive belatacept than it was with cyclosporine (66.3, 62.1, and 53.5 ml per minute per 1.73 m2, respectively), and chronic allograft nephropathy was less common with both regimens of belatacept than with cyclosporine (29 percent, 20 percent, and 44 percent, respectively). Lipid levels and blood-pressure values were similar or slightly lower in the belatacept groups, despite the greater use of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications in the cyclosporine group. Conclusions: Belatacept, an investigational selective costimulation blocker, did not appear to be inferior to cyclosporine as a means of preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation. Belatacept may preserve the glomerular filtration rate and reduce the rate of chronic allograft nephropathy.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050085
It is part of: New England Journal of Medicine, 2005, vol. 353, num. 8, p. 770-781
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/123028
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050085
ISSN: 0028-4793
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
566911.pdf133.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.