Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/123982
Title: Identifying High-risk Individuals For Lung Cancer Screening: Going Beyond Nlst Criteria
Author: Fu Balboa, Marcela
Travier, Noémie
Martín Sánchez, Juan Carlos
Martínez Sánchez, Jose M.
Vidal Lancis, Maria Carmen
García Martínez, Montserrat
LUCAPREV research group
Keywords: Càncer de pulmó
Hàbit de fumar
Espanya
Lung cancer
Tobacco
Spain
Issue Date: 5-Apr-2018
Publisher: Public Library Science
Abstract: Background There are two main types of strategies to identify target population for lung cancer screening: 1) strategies based on age and cumulative smoking criteria, 2) risk prediction models allowing the calculation of an individual risk. The objective of this study was to compare different strategies to identify the proportion of the Spanish population at high risk of developing lung cancer, susceptible to be included in a lung cancer screening programme. Methods Cross-sectional study. We used the data of the Spanish National Interview Health Survey (ENSE) of 2011-2012 (21,006 individuals) to estimate the proportion of participants at high risk of developing lung cancer. This estimation was performed using the U.S. national lung screening trial (NLST) criteria and a 6-year prediction model (PLCOm2012), both independently and in combination. Results The prevalence of individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer according to the NLST criteria was 4.9% (7.9% for men, 2.4% for women). Among the 1,034 subjects who met the NLST criteria, 533 (427 men and 106 women) had a 6-year lung cancer risk >= 2.0%. The combination of these two selection strategies showed that 2.5% of the Spanish population had a high risk of developing lung cancer. However, this selection process did not take into account different groups of subjects <75 years old having an individual risk of lung cancer >= 2%, such as heavy smokers <55 years old who were long-time former smokers, and ever smokers having smoked <30 pack-years with other risk factors. Conclusions Further research is needed to determine which selection strategy achieves a higher benefit/harm ratio and to assess other prevention strategies for individuals with elevated risk for lung cancer but who do not meet the screening eligibility criteria.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195441
It is part of: Plos One, 2018, Vol. 13(4):e0195441
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/123982
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195441
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FuM.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons