Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Acrylamide and glycidamide hemoglobin adducts and epithelial ovarian cancer: a nested case-control study in nonsmoking postmenopausal women from the EPIC cohort|
|Author:||Obón Santacana, Mireia|
Luján Barroso, Leila
Travis, Ruth C.
Fortner, Renée T.
Sánchez Cantalejo, Emilio
Huerta Castaño, José María
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Merritt, Melissa A.
Gunter, Marc J.
Papatesta, Eleni Maria
Bueno de Mesquita, H. Bas
Peeters, Petra H. M.
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
Vesper, Huber W.
Duell, Eric J.
|Publisher:||American Association for Cancer Research|
|Abstract:||Background: Acrylamide was classified as 'probably carcinogenic to humans (group 2A)' by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fourth cause of cancer mortality in women. Five epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between EOC risk and dietary acrylamide intake assessed using food frequency questionnaires, and one nested case-control study evaluated hemoglobin adducts of acrylamide (HbAA) and its metabolite glycidamide (HbGA) and EOC risk; the results of these studies were inconsistent. Methods: A nested case-control study in nonsmoking postmenopausal women (334 cases, 417 controls) was conducted within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between HbAA, HbGA, HbAA+HbGA, and HbGA/HbAA and EOC and invasive serous EOC risk. Results: No overall associations were observed between biomarkers of acrylamide exposure analyzed in quintiles and EOC risk; however, positive associations were observed between some middle quintiles of HbGA and HbAA+HbGA. Elevated but non-statistically significant ORs for serous EOC were observed for HbGA and HbAA+HbGA (ORQ5vsQ1, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.96-3.81 and ORQ5vsQ1, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.94-3.83, respectively); however, no linear dose-response trends were observed. Conclusion: This EPIC nested case-control study failed to observe a clear association between biomarkers of acrylamide exposure and the risk of EOC or invasive serous EOC. Impact: It is unlikely that dietary acrylamide exposure increases ovarian cancer risk; however, additional studies with larger sample size should be performed to exclude any possible association with EOC risk.|
|Note:||Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0822|
|It is part of:||Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 2016, vol. 25, num. 1, p. 127-134|
|Appears in Collections:||Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))|
Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria de Salut Pública, Salut mental i Maternoinfantil)
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.