Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/127549
Title: Rate of adverse events of gastroduodenal snare polypectomy for non-flat polyp is low: A prospective and multicenter study
Author: Córdova, Henry
Argüello, Lidia
Loras Alastruey, Carme
Naranjo Rodríguez, Antonio
Riu Pons, Faust
Gornals Soler, Joan B.
Nicolás Pérez, David
Andújar Murcia, Xavier
Hernández, Luis
Santolaria, Santos
Leal Valdivieso, Carles
Pons Vilardell, Carles
Pérez-Cuadrado Robles, Enrique
García Bosch, Orlando
Papo Berger, Michel
Ulla Rocha, José L.
Sánchez Montes, Cristina
Fernández Esparrach, Glòria
Keywords: Endoscòpia
Duodè
Complicacions quirúrgiques
Pòlips (Patologia)
Endoscopy
Duodenum
Complications of surgery
Polyps (Pathology)
Issue Date: 21-Dec-2017
Publisher: Baishideng Publishing Group
Abstract: AIM: To evaluate the rate of adverse events (AEs) during consecutive gastric and duodenal polypectomies in several Spanish centers. METHODS: Polypectomies of protruded gastric or duodenal polyps ≥ 5 mm using hot snare were prospectively included. Prophylactic measures of hemorrhage were allowed in predefined cases. AEs were defined and graded according to the lexicon recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Patients were followed for 48 h, one week and 1 mo after the procedure. RESULTS: 308 patients were included and a single polypectomy was performed in 205. Only 36 (11.7%) were on prior anticoagulant therapy. Mean polyp size was 15 ± 8.9 mm (5-60) and in 294 cases (95.4%) were located in the stomach. Hemorrhage prophylaxis was performed in 219 (71.1%) patients. Nine patients presented AEs (2.9%), and 6 of them were bleeding (n = 6, 1.9%) (in 5 out of 6 AE, different types of endoscopic treatment were performed). Other 24 hemorrhagic episodes could be managed without any change in the outcome of the endoscopy and, consequently, were considered incidents. We did not find any independent risk factor of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Gastroduodenal polypectomy using prophylactic measures has a rate of AEs small enough to consider this procedure a safe and effective method for polyp resection independently of the polyp size and location.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8405
It is part of: World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, vol. 23, num. 47, p. 8405-8414
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/127549
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8405
ISSN: 1007-9327
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
675477.pdf987.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons