Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/139023
Title: Effect of specific over nonspecific VR-based rehabilitation on poststroke motor recovery: A systematic meta-analysis
Author: Maier, Martina
Rubio Ballester, Belén
Duff, Armin
Duarte Oller, Esther
Verschure, Paul
Keywords: Malalties cerebrovasculars
Realitat virtual
Teràpia ocupacional
Cerebrovascular disease
Virtual reality
Occupational therapy
Issue Date: 1-Feb-2019
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Abstract: Background. Despite the rise of virtual reality (VR)-based interventions in stroke rehabilitation over the past decade, no consensus has been reached on its efficacy. This ostensibly puzzling outcome might not be that surprising given that VR is intrinsically neutral to its use—that is, an intervention is effective because of its ability to mobilize recovery mechanisms, not its technology. As VR systems specifically built for rehabilitation might capitalize better on the advantages of technology to implement neuroscientifically grounded protocols, they might be more effective than those designed for recreational gaming. Objective. We evaluate the efficacy of specific VR (SVR) and nonspecific VR (NSVR) systems for rehabilitating upper-limb function and activity after stroke. Methods. We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials with adult stroke patients to analyze the effect of SVR or NSVR systems versus conventional therapy (CT). Results. We identified 30 studies including 1473 patients. SVR showed a significant impact on body function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.36; P = .0007) versus CT, whereas NSVR did not (SMD = 0.16; 95% CI = −0.14 to 0.47; P = .30). This result was replicated in activity measures. Conclusions. Our results suggest that SVR systems are more beneficial than CT for upper-limb recovery, whereas NSVR systems are not. Additionally, we identified 6 principles of neurorehabilitation that are shared across SVR systems and are possibly responsible for their positive effect. These findings may disambiguate the contradictory results found in the current literature.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318820169
It is part of: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2019, vol. 33, num. 2, p. 112-129
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/139023
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318820169
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (IBEC))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
L24_2019_Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair_33_112.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons