Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/145439
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCamps Font, Octavi-
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Fatás, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorClé-Ovejero, Adrià-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorGay Escoda, Cosme-
dc.contributor.authorValmaseda Castellón, Eduardo-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T16:10:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-26T16:10:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-02-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/145439-
dc.description.abstractBackground: wound infections after dental implant placement are a rare finding that might lead to early implant failure. However, the available information on this topic is scarce. Methods: this retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine factors that may increase the failure rate of dental implants that presented a postoperative infection during the osseointegration period. Postoperative infections were defined as the presence of pus or fistula in the surgical area, with pain or tenderness, swelling, redness, and heat or fever, before prosthetic loading. A bivariate and multivariate analysis of the data using Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to detect prognostic factors for implant failure in patients that suffer infections. Results: the patient-based prevalence of postoperative infections after implant placement was 2.80% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.04% to 3.83%). Thirty-three out of 37 (89.19%) patients with infections had to be surgically retreated because of antibiotic failure and 65% of the infected implants were removed. The bivariate analysis showed a significant association between implant failure and the collar surface (HR: 3.12; 95% CI: 1.16 to 8.41; P = 0.014). Cox proportional-hazards regression indicated that rough-surfaced collars increased 2.35 times the likelihood of failure (95% CI: 0.87 to 6.37; P = 0.071). Conclusions: the survival of implants placed in the maxilla, with smooth collar, and late-onset of infection was higher than those placed in the mandible, with a rough collar and early onset of infection. In general, signs of infection after dental implant placement compromises the survival rate of the affected fixtures.-
dc.format.extent9 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isospa-
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0024-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology, 2018, vol. 89, num. 10, p. 1165-1173-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0024-
dc.rights(c) American Academy of Periodontology, 2018-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)-
dc.subject.classificationImplants dentals-
dc.subject.classificationPeríode postoperatori-
dc.subject.classificationPronòstic mèdic-
dc.subject.classificationInfeccions quirúrgiques-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi de supervivència (Biometria)-
dc.subject.otherDental implants-
dc.subject.otherPostoperative period-
dc.subject.otherPrognosis-
dc.subject.otherSurgical wound infection-
dc.subject.otherSurvival analysis (Biometry)-
dc.titlePostoperative infections after dental implant placement: Variables associated with increased risk of failure-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec682509-
dc.date.updated2019-11-26T16:10:41Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid29797721-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
682509.pdf443.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.