Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/146037
Title: How to Solve the Puzzle of Peer Disagreement
Author: Palmira, Michele
Keywords: Teoria del coneixement
Lògica
Theory of knowledge
Logic
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
Abstract: While it seems hard to deny the epistemic significance of a disagreement with our acknowledged epistemic peers, there are certain disagreements, such as philosophical disagreements, which appear to be permissibly sustainable. These two claims, each independently plausible, are jointly puzzling. This paper argues for a solution to this puzzle. The main tenets of the solution are two. First, the peers ought to engage in a deliberative activity of discovering more about their epistemic position vis-à-vis the issue at stake. Secondly, the peers are permitted to do so while entertaining a sui generis doxastic attitude of hypothesis.
Note: Versió postprint del document publicat a: http://apq.press.uillinois.edu/56/1/palmira.html
It is part of: American Philosophical Quarterly, 2019, vol. 56, num. 1, p. 83-96
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/146037
ISSN: 0003-0481
Appears in Collections:Publicacions de projectes de recerca finançats per la UE
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
686361.pdf238.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.