Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/146974
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPorta, Miquel, 1957--
dc.contributor.authorFernández Muñoz, Esteve-
dc.contributor.authorBelloc, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMalats, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T18:06:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-18T18:06:17Z-
dc.date.issued1998-02-01-
dc.identifier.issn0007-0920-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/146974-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to compare the pre-hospital health care process, clinical characteristics at admission and survival of patients with a digestive tract cancer first admitted to hospital either electively or via the emergency department. The study involved cross-sectional analysis of information elicited through personal interview and prospective follow-up. The setting was a 450-bed public teaching hospital primarily serving a low-income area of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Two hundred and forty-eight symptomatic patients were studied, who had cancer of the oesophagus (n = 31), stomach (n = 70), colon (n = 82) and rectum (n = 65). The main outcome measures were stage, type and intention of treatment and time elapsed from admission to surgery; the relative risk of death was calculated using Cox's regression. There were 161 (65%) patients admitted via the emergency department and 87 (35%) electively. The type of physician seen at the first pre-hospital visit had more often been a general practitioner in the emergency than in the elective group (89% vs 75%, P < 0.01). Emergency patients had seen a lower number of physicians from symptom onset until admission, but two-thirds had made repeated visits to a primary care physician. Emergency patients were less likely to have a localized tumour and a diagnosis of cancer at admission, and surgery as the initial treatment. Median survival was 30 months for elective patients and 8 months for emergency patients (P < 0.001), and the relative risk of death (RR) was 1.83 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.32-2.54). After adjustment for strong prognostic factors, emergency patients continued to experience a significant excess risk (RR = 1.58; CI 1.10-2.27). In conclusion, in digestive tract cancers, admission to hospital via the emergency department is a clinically important marker of a poorer prognosis. Emergency departments can only partly counterbalance deficiencies in the effectiveness of and integration among the different levels of the health system.-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCancer Research UK-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://www.nature.com/bjc/volumes/77/issues/3-
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Cancer, 1998, vol. 77, num. 3, p. 477-484-
dc.rights(c) Porta, Miquel et al., 1998-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer gastrointestinal-
dc.subject.classificationDiagnòstic-
dc.subject.classificationSímptomes-
dc.subject.otherGastrointestinal cancer-
dc.subject.otherDiagnosis-
dc.subject.otherSymptoms-
dc.titleEmergency admission for cancer: a matter of survival?-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec613775-
dc.date.updated2019-12-18T18:06:17Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid9472647-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
613775.pdf1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.