Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/149082
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastejón, Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorTatiana Rovira-
dc.contributor.authorSumalla, Enric C.-
dc.contributor.authorDarder, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorIglesias Casals, Sílvia-
dc.contributor.authorOchoa Arnedo, Cristian-
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Guillermo, Ignacio-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-30T16:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-30T16:33:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-01-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7753-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/149082-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Having an inherited predisposition to cancer may have a psychological impact, and one goal of genetic counseling is to promote psychological adjustment to the new situation. Thus, in the genetic context, validated measures of adjustment are required. Given that self-concept is a good indicator of adjustment to the disease or to the risk for it, and a relevant variable in oncology, the goal of the study is to culturally adapt and validate the BRCA Self-Concept Scale. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred and sixty-five BRCA carriers' women answered to the questionnaire, previously adapted through a process of forward/back-translation, and to the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) as a measure of convergent validity. Theoretical structure of BRCA Self-Concept Scale was assessed by expert judges, and submitted to a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's α was calculated for each subscale (Stigma, Vulnerability and Control), and correlations with CWS were performed. RESULTS: Expert judges' structure and CFA do not support the original structure of the questionnaire. The respecificity model (with items 10 and 13 loading on Vulnerability factor) show a better fit: comparative fit index 0.973; Tucker-Lewis index 0.968; root mean square error of approximation 0.067. The Cronbach's α is 0.83 for Stigma, 0.84 for Vulnerability, and 0.61 for Control. Evidence of convergent validity with CWS has been obtained (Spearman's rho 0.631 for Stigma, 0.683 for Vulnerability, and -0.363 for Control; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the validity of the modified Spanish BRCA Self-Concept Scale, which is a potentially useful measure for the study of psychological adjustment to high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.-
dc.format.extent7 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isospa-
dc.publisherElsevier España-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.09.018-
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Clinica, 2016, vol. 146, num. 4, p. 148-154-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.09.018-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier España, 2016-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)-
dc.subject.classificationTests psicològics-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de mama-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer d'ovari-
dc.subject.classificationMalalties hereditàries-
dc.subject.otherPsychological tests-
dc.subject.otherBreast cancer-
dc.subject.otherOvarian cancer-
dc.subject.otherGenetic diseases-
dc.titleAdaptación cultural y validación de la versión española de la Escala de Autoconcepto en BRCA en mujeres portadoras con alto riesgo de cáncer de mama y ovario hereditario-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec655929-
dc.date.updated2020-01-30T16:33:00Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
655929.pdf484.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons