Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/160057
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Carpintero, Manuel-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-13T15:25:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-13T15:25:05Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn0873-626X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/160057-
dc.description.abstractSingular terms used in fictions for fictional characters raise well-known philosophical issues, explored in depth in the literature. But philosophers typically assume that names already in use to refer to 'moderate-sized specimens of dry goods' cause no special problem when occurring in fictions, behaving there as they ordinarily do in straightforward assertions. In this paper I continue a debate with Stacie Friend, arguing against this for the exceptionalist view that names of real entities in fictional discourse don't work there as they do in simple-sentence assertions, but rather as fictional names do.-
dc.format.extent35 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherUniversidade de Lisboa-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://www.disputatio.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofDisputatio, 2019, vol. XI, 54, p. 143-177-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) García-Carpintero, Manuel, 2019-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi del discurs-
dc.subject.classificationReferència (Filosofia)-
dc.subject.otherDiscourse analysis-
dc.subject.otherReference (Philosophy)-
dc.titleSingular Reference in Fictional Discourse?-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec699102-
dc.date.updated2020-05-13T15:25:05Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
699102.pdf309 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons