Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/168022
Title: Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer After a Partial Response to the Last Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Trial
Author: Del Campo, Josep M.
Matulonis, Ursula A.
Malander, Susanne
Provencher, Diane
Mahner, Sven
Follana, Philippe
Waters, Justin
Berek, Jonathan S.
Woie, Kathrine
Oza, Amit M.
Canzler, Ulrich
Gil-Martin, Marta
Lesoin, Anne
Monk, Bradley J.
Lund, Bente
Gilbert, Lucy
Wenham, Robert M.
Benigno, Benedict
Arora, Sujata
Hazard, Sebastien J.
Mirza, Mansoor R.
Keywords: Càncer d'ovari
Quimioteràpia del càncer
Ovarian cancer
Chemotherapy
Issue Date: 10-Nov-2019
Publisher: Amer Soc Clinical Oncology
Abstract: PURPOSEIn the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274), maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, prolonged progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer who had a response to their last platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective of the study was to assess the clinical benefit and patient-reported outcomes in patients who had a partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) to their last platinum-based therapy.PATIENTS AND METHODSA total of 553 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of 203 patients with a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAmut), 99 had a PR and 104 had a CR to their last platinum-based therapy; of 350 patients without a confirmed gBRCAmut (non?gBRCAmut), 173 had a PR and 177 had a CR. Post hoc analyses were carried out to evaluate safety and the risk of progression in these patients according to gBRCAmut status and response to their last platinum-based therapy. Ovarian cancer?specific symptoms and quality of life were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy?Ovarian Symptom Index.RESULTSProgression-free survival was improved in patients treated with niraparib compared with placebo in both the gBRCAmut cohort (PR: hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.131 to 0.441; P < .0001; CR: HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.160 to 0.546; P < .0001) and the non?gBRCAmut cohort (PR: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.230 to 0.532; P < .0001; CR: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.383 to 0.868; P = .0082). The incidence of any-grade and grade 3 or greater adverse events was manageable. No meaningful differences were observed between niraparib and placebo in PR and CR subgroups with respect to patient-reported outcomes.CONCLUSIONPatients achieved clinical benefit from maintenance treatment with niraparib regardless of response to the last platinum-based therapy.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02238
It is part of: Journal Of Clinical Oncology, 2019-11-10, Vol. 37, Issue 32, P. 2968-2973
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/168022
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02238
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
delCampoJM.pdf853.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons