Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/171888
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, Gianluca-
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Nicola M.-
dc.contributor.authorMercadé Bellido, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorCortese, Teresa-
dc.contributor.authorStaffoli, Simone-
dc.contributor.authorGambarini, Gianluca-
dc.contributor.authorTestarelli, Luca-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T12:50:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-09T12:50:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-07-
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/171888-
dc.description.abstractObjective: to evaluate the efficacy of different sonic and ultrasonic devices in the elimination of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. Materials and Methods: a resin model of a transparent radicular canal filled with dentin debris was used. Five groups were tested, namely: Group 1 - ultrasonic insert 15.02; Group 2 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI K; Group 3 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; Group 4 - sonic insert 20/28 Eddy on a vibrating sonic air-scaler handpiece; Group 5 - 20.02 K-file inserted on a Safety M4 handpiece. Two different irrigants (5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA) and 3 different times of activation (20, 40, and 60 seconds) were tested. Means and standard deviations were calculated and statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). Results: no statistically significant differences were found between the two irrigants used. Group 4 removed more debris than the other groups (p<0.05). Groups 1, 2, and 3 removed more debris than group 5 (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found for the time of activation in all groups and at all canal levels, except between 40 and 60 seconds in group 4 at coronal and middle third level (p>0.05). Conclusions: no significant differences were found between 5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. When the time of activation rises, the dentin debris removal increases in all groups. Both sonic and ultrasonic activation demonstrate high capacity for dentin debris removal.-
dc.format.extent6 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0045-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science, 2019, vol. 27, p. e20180045-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0045-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Plotino, Gianluca et al., 2019-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)-
dc.subject.classificationSodi-
dc.subject.classificationÀcids-
dc.subject.classificationDesinfecció-
dc.subject.otherSodium-
dc.subject.otherAcids-
dc.subject.otherDisinfection-
dc.titleEfficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from root canal irregularities in artificial root canals-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec682068-
dc.date.updated2020-11-09T12:50:56Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid30624461-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
682068.pdf486.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons