Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/172457
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEsteve i Comas, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorRosinach, Mercè-
dc.contributor.authorLlordés, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorCalpe, Judit-
dc.contributor.authorMontserrat, Glòria-
dc.contributor.authorPujals, Mar-
dc.contributor.authorCela, Abel-
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco García, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorIbarra, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Ramirez, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorTristán, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorArau, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Carme-
dc.contributor.authorMariné, Meritxell-
dc.contributor.authorRibes Puig, Josepa-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Bañares, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorPrimary Care Coeliac Disease Study Group-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T13:45:19Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-01T13:45:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-01-
dc.identifier.issn2050-6406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/172457-
dc.description.abstractBackground: An on-site, rapid, fingertip, whole-blood point-of-care test (POCT) is attractive for active case-finding of coeliac disease (CD) in primary care because of its simplicity. Aim: The aim of this article is to assess the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of adult case-finding using a POCT based on deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (IgA/IgG-DGP) in primary care for CD diagnosis. Methods: A case-finding study for CD was conducted by using an easy-to-use, on-site, whole-blood for IgA/IgG-DGP-based fingertip POCT compared with tTG2 in 350 individuals. Sample size was calculated based on 0.28% prevalence in the reference population. Duodenal biopsies for histology, intraepithelial lymphocytes and in situ deposition of tTG2 were obtained if tTG2 and/or POCT were positive. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of strategies using serology or POCT were calculated. Results: Prevalence of CD was 1.14% (95% CI, 0.3-3.4), almost double what was previously observed. Four patients were diagnosed with CD. tTG2 was positive in three (0.85%) and POCT in 29 (8.2%). Sensitivity of POCT for CD was 100%, specificity 93%, PPV 14%, and NPV 100%. POCT followed by duodenal biopsy was the most cost-effective approach in our setting (standard diagnosis: E13,033/case; POCT þ duodenal biopsy: E7360/case). Conclusions: A negative POCT allows ruling out CD in primary care, making it suitable for case-finding. POCT strategy was the most cost effective.-
dc.format.extent11 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618761700-
dc.relation.ispartofUnited European Gastroenterology Journal, 2018, vol. 6, num. 6, p. 855-865-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618761700-
dc.rightscc by-nc (c) Esteve i Comas, Maria et al., 2018-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)-
dc.subject.classificationMalaltia celíaca-
dc.subject.classificationDiagnòstic-
dc.subject.otherCeliac disease-
dc.subject.otherDiagnosis-
dc.titleCase-finding in primary care for coeliac disease: Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec684837-
dc.date.updated2020-12-01T13:45:19Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid30023063-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
684837.pdf510.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons