Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/173849
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSancho, Juan Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Alvarez, Rubén-
dc.contributor.authorGual Capllonch, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, Esther-
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Norma-
dc.contributor.authorPeñarrubia, María Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorBatlle López, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Barca, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorGuinea, José María-
dc.contributor.authorGimeno, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorPeñalver, Francisco J.-
dc.contributor.authorFuertes, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Mariana-
dc.contributor.authorHernández Rivas, José Ángel-
dc.contributor.authorMoraleda, José María-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Olga-
dc.contributor.authorSorigué, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Alejandro-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T08:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-11T08:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/173849-
dc.description.abstractThe use of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been investigated in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies. This was a prospective phase 2 trial of DLBCL patients ≥60 years old with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% randomized to standard R-CHOP or investigational R-COMP (with Myocet® instead of conventional doxorubicin). The primary end point was to evaluate the differences in subclinical cardiotoxicity, defined as decrease in LVEF to <55% at the end of treatment. Secondary objectives were efficacy, safety, and variations of troponin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and LVEF along follow-up. Ninety patients were included, 45 in each group. No differences were observed in the percentage of patients with LVEF <55% at end of treatment (11% in R-CHOP arm vs. 7% in R-COMP arm, p = 0.697) or at 4 months (10% vs. 6%, respectively, p = 0.667) and 12 months (8% vs. 7%, respectively, p = 1). However, a higher percentage of R-CHOP compared with R-COMP patients showed increased troponin levels in cycle 6 (100% vs. 63%, p = 0.001) and at 1 month after treatment (88% vs. 56%, respectively, p = 0.015). Cardiovascular adverse events were seen in five R-CHOP patients (nine episodes, four grade ≥3) and in four R-COMP patients (five episodes, all grade 1–2). No significant differences in efficacy were observed. In conclusion, R-COMP is a feasible immunochemotherapy schedule for DLBCL patients ≥60 years, with similar efficacy to R-CHOP. However, the use of non-pegylated doxorubicin instead of conventional doxorubicin was not associated with less early cardiotoxicity, although some reduced cardiac safety signals were observed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02012088.-
dc.format.extent13 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3730-
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Medicine, 2021-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3730-
dc.rightscc by (c) Sancho et al., 2021-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationLimfomes-
dc.subject.classificationCèl·lules B-
dc.subject.otherLymphomas-
dc.subject.otherB cells-
dc.titleR‐COMP versus R‐CHOP as first‐line therapy for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in patients ≥60 years: Results of a randomized phase 2 study from the Spanish GELTAMO group-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2021-02-11T07:29:24Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid33492774-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cam4.3730.pdf514.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons