Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/173937
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Ibán, Miguel Angel-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Alepuz, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorDiaz Heredia, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorHachem, Abdul-Ilah-
dc.contributor.authorEzagüi Bentolila, Leon-
dc.contributor.authorCalvo, Angel-
dc.contributor.authorVerdú, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorRus Aznar, Ignacio de-
dc.contributor.authorSoler Romagosa, Francesc-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-15T11:46:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-15T11:46:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/173937-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate if adding nanofractures to the footprint of a supraspinatus tear repair would have any effect in the outcomes at one-year follow-up. Methods: Multicentric, triple-blinded, randomized trial with 12-months follow-up. Subjects with isolated symptomatic reparable supraspinatus tears smaller than 3 cm and without grade 4 fatty infiltration were included. These were randomized to two groups: In the Control group an arthroscopic supraspinatus repair was performed; in the Nanofracture group the footprint was additionally prepared with nanofractures (1 mm wide, 9 mm deep microfractures). Clinical evaluation was done with Constant score, EQ-5D-3L, and Brief Pain Inventory. The primary outcome was the retear rate in MRI at 12-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were: characteristics of the retear (at the footprint or at the musculotendinous junction) and clinical outcomes. Results: Seventy-one subjects were randomized. Two were lost to follow-up, leaving 69 participants available for assessment at 12-months follow-up (33 in the Control group and 36 in the Nanofracture Group). The Nanofracture group had lower retear rates than the Control group (7/36 [19.4%] vs 14/33 [42.4%], differences significant, p = 0.038). Retear rates at the musculotendinous junction were similar but the Nanofracture group had better tendon healing rates to the bone (34/36 [94.4%] vs. 24/33 [66.71%], p = 0.014). Clinically both groups had significant improvements, but no differences were found between groups. Conclusion: Adding nanofractures at the footprint during an isolated supraspinatus repair lowers in half the retear rate at 12-months follow-up. This is due to improved healing at the footprint.-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06073-7-
dc.relation.ispartofKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06073-7-
dc.rightscc by (c) Ruiz Ibán et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))-
dc.subject.classificationArtroscòpia-
dc.subject.classificationEspatlla-
dc.subject.classificationFractures-
dc.subject.otherArthroscopy-
dc.subject.otherShoulder-
dc.subject.otherFractures-
dc.titleFootprint preparation with nanofractures in a supraspinatus repair cuts in half the retear rate at 1-year follow-up. A randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.date.updated2021-02-12T11:28:12Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32488368-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RuizIbán2020_Article_FootprintPreparationWithNanofr.pdf879.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons