Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/174761
Title: Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp): Spanish Validation and Relationship With Cognitive Insight in Psychotic Patients
Author: Corral, Lia
Labad, Javier
Ochoa, Susana
Cabezas, Angel
Muntané, Gerard
Valero, Joaquín
Sanchez-Gistau, Vanessa
Ahuir, Maribel
Gallardo-Pujol, David
Crosas, Josep María
Palao Vidal, Diego J.
Vilella, Elisabet
Gutierrez-Zotes, Alfonso
Keywords: Psicosi
Deliri
Trastorns de la cognició
Qüestionaris
Psychoses
Delirium
Cognition disorders
Questionnaires
Issue Date: 18-Feb-2021
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Abstract: Introduction: Cognitive biases are key factors in the development and persistence of delusions in psychosis. The Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp) is a new self-reported questionnaire of 30 relevant situations to evaluate five types of cognitive biases in psychosis. In the context of the validation of the Spanish version of the CBQp, our objectives were to (1) analyze the factorial structure of the questionnaire with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), (2) relate cognitive biases with a widely used scale in the field of delusion cognitive therapies for assessing metacognition, specifically, Beck's Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) (1), and, finally, (3) associate cognitive biases with delusional experiences, evaluated with the Peters Delusions Inventory (PDI) (2). Materials and Methods: An authorized Spanish version of the CBQp, by a translation and back-translation procedure, was obtained. A sample of 171 patients with different diagnoses of psychoses was included. A CFA was used to test three different construct models. Associations between CBQp biases, the BCIS, and the PDI were made by correlation and mean differences. Comparisons of the CBQp scores between a control group and patients with psychosis were analyzed. Results: The CFA showed comparative fit index (CFI) values of 0.94 and 0.95 for the models with one, two, and five factors, with root mean square error of approximation values of 0.031 and 0.029. The CBQp reliability was 0.87. Associations between cognitive biases, self-certainty, and cognitive insight subscales of the BCIS were found. Similarly, associations between total punctuation, conviction, distress, and concern subscales of the PDI were also found. When compared with the group of healthy subjects, patients with psychoses scored significantly higher in several cognitive biases. Conclusion: Given the correlation between biases, a one-factor model might be more appropriate to explain the scale's underlying construct. Biases were associated with a greater frequency of delusions, distress, conviction, and concern as well as worse cognitive insight in patients with psychosis.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.596625
It is part of: Frontiers In Psychiatry, 2021, vol. 11, p. 596625
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/174761
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.596625
ISSN: 1664-0640
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
707203.pdf417.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons