Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/174849
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRisco, Ester-
dc.contributor.authorSauch, Gloria-
dc.contributor.authorAlbero, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorAcar Denizli, Nihan-
dc.contributor.authorZabalegui Yárnoz, Adelaida-
dc.contributor.authorKostov, Belchin-
dc.contributor.authorAmil, Paloma-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Albert-
dc.contributor.authorRios, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorMartín, Jaume-
dc.contributor.authorFabrellas i Padrès, Núria-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T14:16:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-09T14:16:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-11-
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/174849-
dc.description.abstractOlder people with complex, chronic conditions often receive insufficient or inefficient care provision, and few instruments are able to measure their perception of care provision. The "User ReportedMeasure of Care Coordination" instrument has been satisfactorily used to evaluate chronic care provision and integration. The aim of this study is to validate this instrument in Spanish. Methods: The questionnairewas adapted and validated in two phases: translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire and psychometric property measurement. Study population were chronic care conditions patients. Results: A total of 332 participants completed test re-test as part of the questionnaire validation process. The final version of the questionnaire had 6 domains: Health andWell-being (D1), Health day to day (D2), Social Services (D3), Planned Care (D4), Urgent Care (D5), and Hospital Care (D6). Cronbach's alpha for the overall questionnaire was 0.86, indicating good internal consistency. When analyzing each domain, only Planned Care (D4) and Urgent Care (D5) had Cronbach's Alphas slightly lower than 0.7, although this could be related to the low number of items in each domain. A good temporal stabilitywas observed for the distinct subscales and items,with intraclass correlation coefficients varying from0.412 to 0.929 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The adapted version of the "User ReportedMeasure of Care Coordination" into Spanish proved to be a practical tool for use in our daily practice and an efficient instrument for assessment of care coordination in chronic, complex conditions in older people across services and levels of care.-
dc.format.extent13 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186608-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, num. 18-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186608-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Risco, Ester et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Infermeria de Salut Pública, Salut mental i Maternoinfantil)-
dc.subject.classificationSalut pública-
dc.subject.classificationPersones grans-
dc.subject.classificationAssistència a les persones grans-
dc.subject.classificationComorbiditat-
dc.subject.otherPublic health-
dc.subject.otherOlder people-
dc.subject.otherOld age assistance-
dc.subject.otherComorbidity-
dc.titleSpanish Validation of the 'User Reported Measure of Care Coordination' Questionnaire for Older People with Complex, Chronic Conditions-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec705409-
dc.date.updated2021-03-09T14:16:42Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32932760-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria de Salut Pública, Salut mental i Maternoinfantil)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
705409.pdf359.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons