Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/175263
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBailey, M. H.-
dc.contributor.authorMeyerson, W. U.-
dc.contributor.authorDursi, L. J.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, L. B.-
dc.contributor.authorDong, G.-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, W. W.-
dc.contributor.authorWeerasinghe, A.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKelso, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMC3 Working Group-
dc.contributor.authorSaksena, G.-
dc.contributor.authorEllrott, K.-
dc.contributor.authorWendl, M. C.-
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, D. A.-
dc.contributor.authorGetz, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, J. T.-
dc.contributor.authorGerstein, M. B.-
dc.contributor.authorDing, L.-
dc.contributor.authorPCAWG Consortium-
dc.contributor.authorRabionet Janssen, Raquel-
dc.contributor.authorGelpí Buchaca, Josep Lluís-
dc.contributor.authorAymerich Gregorio, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorCampo Güerri, Elias-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Guillermo, Armando-
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Subero, José Ignacio-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T15:27:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-17T15:27:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-21-
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/175263-
dc.description.abstractThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts.-
dc.format.extent27 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18151-y-
dc.relation.ispartofNature Communications, 2020, vol. 11, num. 1, p. 4748-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18151-y-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20128-w-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Bailey, M.H. et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer-
dc.subject.classificationTransformació genètica-
dc.subject.otherCancer-
dc.subject.otherGenetic transformation-
dc.titleRetrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec704393-
dc.identifier.idgrec714523-
dc.date.updated2021-03-17T15:27:16Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32958763-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Bioquímica i Biomedicina Molecular)
Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
704393.pdf2.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
714523.pdfAuthor Correction602.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons