Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/176646
Title: Placing Cognitive Rigidity in Interpersonal Context in Psychosis: Relationship With Low Cognitive Reserve and High Self-Certainty
Author: García Mieres, Helena
Usall, Judith
Feixas i Viaplana, Guillem
Ochoa Güerre, Susana
Keywords: Esquizofrènia
Cognició
Psicosi
Schizophrenia
Cognition
Psychoses
Issue Date: 26-Nov-2020
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Abstract: Introduction: People with psychosis show impairments in cognitive flexibility, a phenomenon that is still poorly understood. In this study, we tested if there were differences in cognitive and metacognitive processes related to rigidity in patients with psychosis. We compared individuals with dichotomous interpersonal thinking and those with flexible interpersonal thinking. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis using two groups with psychosis, one with low levels of dichotomous interpersonal thinking (n = 42) and the other with high levels of dichotomous interpersonal thinking (n = 43). The patients were classified by splitting interpersonal dichotomous thinking (measured using the repertory grid technique) to the median. The groups were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, a semi-structured interview to assess psychotic symptoms [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)], a self-report of cognitive insight [Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)], neurocognitive tasks [Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)], and the repertory grid technique. We used a logistic regression model to test which factors best differentiate the two groups. Results: The group with high dichotomous interpersonal thinking had earlier age at onset of the psychotic disorder, higher self-certainty, impaired executive functioning, affected abstract thinking, and lower estimated cognitive reserve than the group with flexible thinking. According to the logistic regression model, estimated cognitive reserve and self-certainty were the variables that better differentiated between the two groups. Conclusion: Cognitive rigidity may be a generalized bias that affects not only neurocognitive and metacognitive processes but also the sense of self and significant others. Patients with more dichotomous interpersonal thinking might benefit from interventions that target this cognitive bias on an integrative way and that is adapted to their general level of cognitive abilities.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.594840
It is part of: Frontiers In Psychiatry, 2020, vol. 11, p. 594840
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/176646
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.594840
ISSN: 1664-0640
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut de Neurociències (UBNeuro))
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
710044.pdf304.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons