Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178467
Title: Enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular holes.
Author: Stalmans, Peter
Benz, Matthew S.
Gandorfer, Arnd
Kampik, Anselm
Girach, Aniz
Pakola, Stephen
Haller, Julia A.
Arias Barquet, Lluís
MIVI-TRUST Study Group
Keywords: Ull
Pèptids
Retina
Eye
Peptides
Retina
Issue Date: 16-Aug-2012
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Abstract: Background: vitreomacular adhesion can lead to pathologic traction and macular hole. The standard treatment for severe, symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion is vitrectomy. Ocriplasmin is a recombinant protease with activity against fibronectin and laminin, components of the vitreoretinal interface. Methods: we conducted two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trials to compare a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin (125 μg) with a placebo injection in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion. The primary end point was resolution of vitreomacular adhesion at day 28. Secondary end points were total posterior vitreous detachment and nonsurgical closure of a macular hole at 28 days, avoidance of vitrectomy, and change in best-corrected visual acuity. Results: overall, 652 eyes were treated: 464 with ocriplasmin and 188 with placebo. Vitreomacular adhesion resolved in 26.5% of ocriplasmin-injected eyes and in 10.1% of placebo-injected eyes (P<0.001). Total posterior vitreous detachment was more prevalent among the eyes treated with ocriplasmin than among those injected with placebo (13.4% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001). Nonsurgical closure of macular holes was achieved in 40.6% of ocriplasmin-injected eyes, as compared with 10.6% of placebo-injected eyes (P<0.001). The best-corrected visual acuity was more likely to improve by a gain of at least three lines on the eye chart with ocriplasmin than with placebo. Ocular adverse events (e.g., vitreous floaters, photopsia, or injection-related eye pain--all self-reported--or conjunctival hemorrhage) occurred in 68.4% of ocriplasmin-injected eyes and in 53.5% of placebo-injected eyes (P<0.001), and the incidence of serious ocular adverse events was similar in the two groups (P=0.26). Conclusions: intravitreal injection of the vitreolytic agent ocriplasmin resolved vitreomacular traction and closed macular holes in significantly more patients than did injection of placebo and was associated with a higher incidence of ocular adverse events, which were mainly transient. (Funded by ThromboGenics; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00781859 and NCT00798317.).
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110823
It is part of: New England Journal of Medicine, 2012, vol. 367, num. 7, p. 606-615
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178467
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110823
ISSN: 0028-4793
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
687603.pdf590.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.