Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178507
Title: Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Author: Hauser, Stephen L.
Bar-Or, Amit
Comi, Giancarlo
Giovannoni, Gavin
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Hemmer, Bernhard
Lublin, Fred
Montalbán Gairín, Xavier
Rammohan, Kottil W.
Selmaj, Krzysztof
Traboulsee, Anthony
Wolinsky, Jerry S.
Arnold, Douglas L.
Klingelschmitt, Gaelle
Masterman, Donna
Fontoura, Paulo
Belachew, Shibeshih
Chin, Peter
Mairon, Nicole
Garren, Hideki
Kappos, Ludwig
Martínez Yélamos, Sergio
OPERA I
OPERA II Clinical Investigators
Keywords: Anticossos monoclonals
Immunologia
Esclerosi múltiple
Monoclonal antibodies
Immunology
Multiple sclerosis
Issue Date: 19-Jan-2017
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Abstract: Background: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. Methods: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a at a dose of 44 μg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Results: the annualized relapse rate was lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 46% lower rate with ocrelizumab; P<0.001) and in trial 2 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 47% lower rate; P<0.001). In prespecified pooled analyses, the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was significantly lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a (9.1% vs. 13.6%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.81; P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks (6.9% vs. 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P=0.003). The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper-limb movements, and cognition; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta-1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Conclusions: among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta-1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 , respectively).
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277
It is part of: New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, vol. 376, num. 3, p. 221-234
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/178507
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277
ISSN: 0028-4793
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
677313.pdf287 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.