Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/179782
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMusquera i Felip, Mireia-
dc.contributor.authorPeri Cusí, Lluís-
dc.contributor.authorAjami, Tarek-
dc.contributor.authorRevuelta, Ignacio-
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo Reyes, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMercader, Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorSierra, Alba-
dc.contributor.authorDiekmann, Fritz-
dc.contributor.authorD'Anna, Maurizio-
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve, Concepción-
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz Asensio, Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T09:38:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-31T09:38:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-02-
dc.identifier.issn2314-6133-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/179782-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Nowadays, minimally invasive surgery in kidney transplantation is a reality thanks to robotic assistance. In this paper, we describe our experience, how we developed the robotic assisted Kidney transplantation (RAKT) technique, and analyze our results. Material and Methods. This is a retrospective study of all RAKTs performed at our center between July 2015 and March 2020. We describe the donor selection, surgical technique, and analyze the surgical results and complications. A comparison between the first 20 cases and the following ones is performed. Results. During the aforementioned period, 82 living donor RAKTs were performed. The mean age was and 50 (61%) were male. Mean body mass index was and preemptive in 63.7% of cases. Right kidneys and multiple arteries were seen in 14.6% and 12.2%, respectively. Mean operative and rewarming time was and minutes, respectively. Five cases required conversion to open surgery because of abnormal kidney vascularization. Two patients required embolization for subcapsular and hypogastric artery bleeding without repercussion. Three kidneys were lost, two of them due to acute rejection and one because venous thrombosis. Late complications requiring surgery included one kidney artery stenosis, one ureteral stenosis, two lymphoceles, and three hernia repairs. We noticed a significant reduction in time between the first 20 cases and the following ones from to (). With a mean follow-up time of 1.8 years (SD 1.3), the mean creatinine was 1.52 (SD 0.7) and RAKT graft survival was 98%. Conclusions. The robotic approach is an attractive, minimally invasive method for kidney transplantation, yielding good results. Further studies are needed to consider it a standard approach.-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherHindawi-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907-
dc.relation.ispartofBioMed Research International, 2020, vol. 2020, num. 8687907-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Musquera i Felip, Mireia et al., 2020-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)-
dc.subject.classificationTrasplantament hepàtic-
dc.subject.classificationRobòtica en medicina-
dc.subject.otherHepatic transplantation-
dc.subject.otherRobotics in medicine-
dc.titleResults and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec707674-
dc.date.updated2021-08-31T09:38:51Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid32934965-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
707674.pdf987.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons