Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/179806
Title: A comparison of complementary measures of vitamin B6 status, function, and metabolism in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
Author: Clasen, Joanna L.
Heath, Alicia K.
Van Puyvelde, Heleen
Huybrechts, Inge
Park, Jing Young
Ferrari, Pietro
Johansson, Mattias
Scelo, Ghislaine
Ulvik, Arve
Midttun, Øivind
Ueland, Per Magne
Dahm, Christina C.
Halkjær, Jytte
Olsen, Anja
Johnson, Theron
Katzke, Verena
Schulze, Matthias B.
Masala, Giovanna
Segrado, Francesco
Santucci de Magistris, Maria
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Ocké, Marga C.
Luján Barroso, Leila
Ching López, Ana
Huerta, José María
Ardanaz, Eva
Amiano, Pilar
Ericson, Ulrika
Manjer, Jonas
Gylling, Björn
Johansson, Ingegerd
Schmidt, Julie
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Riboli, Elio
Cross, Amanda J.
Muller, David C.
Keywords: Vitamines
Factors de risc en les malalties
Marcadors bioquímics
Càncer
Vitamins
Risk factors in diseases
Biochemical markers
Cancer
Issue Date: 7-Apr-2021
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract: Background: Vitamin B6 insufficiency has been linked to increased risk of cancer and other chronic diseases. The circulating concentration of pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) is a commonly used measure of vitamin B6 status. Ratios of substrates indicating PLP coenzymatic function and metabolism may be useful complementary measures to further explore the role of vitamin B6 in health. Objectives: We explored the sensitivity of 5 outcomes, namely PLP concentration, homocysteine:cysteine (Hcy:Cys), cystathionine:cysteine (Cysta:Cys), the 3´-hydroxykynurenine ratio (HKr), and the 4-pyridoxic acid ratio (PAr) to vitamin B6 intake as well as personal and lifestyle characteristics. Medthods: Dietary intake and biomarker data were collected from participants from 3 nested case-control studies within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Bayesian regression models assessed the associations of the 5 biomarker outcomes with vitamin B6 intake and personal and lifestyle covariates. Analogous models examined the relations of Hcy:Cys, Cysta:Cys, and HKr with PLP. Results: In total, 4608 participants were included in the analyses. Vitamin B6 intake was most strongly associated with PLP, moderately associated with Hcy:Cys, Cysta:Cys, and HKr, and not associated with PAr (fold change in marker given a doubling of vitamin B6 intake: PLP 1.60 [95% credible interval (CrI): 1.50, 1.71]; Hcy:Cys 0.87 [95% CrI: 0.84, 0.90]; Cysta:Cys 0.89 [95% CrI: 0.84, 0.94]; HKr 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.85, 0.91]; PAr 1.00 [95% CrI: 0.95, 1.05]). PAr was most sensitive to age, and HKr was least sensitive to BMI and alcohol intake. Sex and menopause status were strongly associated with all 5 markers. Conclusions: We found that 5 different markers, capturing different aspects of vitamin B6-related biological processes, varied in their associations with vitamin B6 intake and personal and lifestyle predictors.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab045
It is part of: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, vol. 114, num. 1, p. 338-347
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/179806
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab045
ISSN: 1938-3207
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A comparison of complementary measures of vitamin B6 status.pdf1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons