Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/182678
Title: The impact of ABCDE bundle implementation on patient outcomes: a nationwide cohort study
Author: Frade Mera, María Jesús
Arias-Rivera, Susana
Zaragoza-García, Ignacio
Martí, Joan Daniel
Gallart, Elisabet
San José-Arribas, Alicia
Velasco-Sanz, Tamara Raquel
Blazquez-Martínez, Eva
Raurell Torredà, Marta
Keywords: Unitats de cures intensives
Deliri
Tractament del dolor
Respiració artificial
Malalts en estat crític
Cura dels malalts
Intensive care units
Delirium
Pain treatment
Artificial respiration
Critically ill
Care of the sick
Issue Date: 6-Jan-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Abstract: Background: The ABCDE bundle is a set of evidence-based practices to systematically reduce the risks of sedation, delirium, and immobility in intensive care patients. Implementing the bundle improves clinical outcome. Aims and Objectives: To investigate the association between patient outcomes and compliance with bundle components ABC (analgosedation algorithms), D (delirium protocol), and E (early mobilization protocol). Design: A Spanish multicentre cohort study of adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for ≥48 h until extubation. Methods: The primary outcome was pain level, cooperation to permit Medical Research Council Scale administration, patient days of delirium, and mobility. The secondary outcome was cumulative drug dosing by IMV days. Tertiary outcomes (ICU days, IMV days, bed rest days, ICU mortality, ICUAW) and independent variables (analgosedation, delirium, early mobilization protocols) were also studied. Results: Data were collected from 605 patients in 80 ICUs and 5214 patient days with IMV. Two-thirds of the ICUs studied applied no protocols. Pain was not assessed on 83.6% of patient days. Patient cooperation made scale administration feasible on 20.7% of days. Delirium and immobility were found on 4.2% and 69.9% of days, respectively. Patients had shorter stays in ICUs with bundle protocols and fewer days of IMV in ICUs with delirium and mobilization bundle components (P = 0.006 and P = 0.03, respectively). Analgosedation protocols were associated with more opioid dosing (P = 0.02), and delirium and early mobilization protocols with more propofol (P = 0.001), dexmedetomidine (P = 0.001), and lower benzodiazepine dosing (P = 0.008). Conclusions: The implementation rate of ABCDE bundle components was very low in our Spanish setting, but when implemented, patients had a shorter ICU stay, more analgesia dosing, and lighter sedation. Relevance to clinical practice: Applying some but not all the bundle components, there is increased analgesia and light sedation drug use, decreased benzodiazepines, and increased patient cooperation and mobility, resulting in a shorter ICU stay and fewer days of IMV.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12740
It is part of: Nursing in Critical Care, 2022, p. 1-12
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/182678
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12740
ISSN: 1362-1017
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
717069.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons