Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184262
Title: Fosfomycin plus Beta-lactams: Synergistic Bactericidal Combinations in Methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and Glycopeptide-Intermediate Resistant (GISA) Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Endocarditis
Author: Rio Fernández, Antonio del
Garcia de la Mària, Cristina
Entenza, José Manuel
Gasch, Oriol
Armero, Yolanda
Soy Muner, Dolors
Mestres Lucio, Carlos-Alberto
Pericàs, Juan M.
Falces Salvador, Carles
Ninot, Salvador
Almela, M. (Manel)
Cervera, Carlos
Gatell, José M.
Moreno Camacho, Ma. Asunción
Moreillon, Philippe
Marco Reverté, Francesc
Miró Meda, José M.
Hospital Clínic Experimental Endocarditis Study Group
Keywords: Endocarditis
Antibiòtics
Endocarditis
Antibiotics
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2016
Publisher: American Society for Microbiology
Abstract: The urgent need of effective therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infective endocarditis (IE) is a cause of concern. We aimed to ascertain the in vitro and in vivo activity of the older antibiotic fosfomycin combined with different beta-lactams against MRSA and glycopeptide-intermediate-resistant S. aureus (GISA) strains. Time-kill tests with 10 isolates showed that fosfomycin plus imipenem (FOF+IPM) was the most active evaluated combination. In an aortic valve IE model with two strains (MRSA-277H and GISA-ATCC 700788), the following intravenous regimens were compared: fosfomycin (2 g every 8 h [q8h]) plus imipenem (1 g q6h) or ceftriaxone (2 g q12h) (FOF+CRO) and vancomycin at a standard dose (VAN-SD) (1 g q12h) and a high dose (VAN-HD) (1 g q6h). Whereas a significant reduction of MRSA-227H load in the vegetations (veg) was observed with FOF+IPM compared with VAN-SD (0 [interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 1] versus 2 [IQR, 0 to 5.1] log CFU/g veg; P = 0.01), no statistical differences were found with VAN-HD. In addition, FOF+IPM sterilized more vegetations than VAN-SD (11/15 [73%] versus 5/16 [31%]; P = 0.02). The GISA-ATCC 700788 load in the vegetations was significantly lower after FOF+IPM or FOF+CRO treatment than with VAN-SD (2 [IQR, 0 to 2] and 0 [IQR, 0 to 2] versus 6.5 [IQR, 2 to 6.9] log CFU/g veg; P < 0.01). The number of sterilized vegetations after treatment with FOF+CRO was higher than after treatment with VAN-SD or VAN-HD (8/15 [53%] versus 4/20 [20%] or 4/20 [20%]; P = 0.03). To assess the effect of FOF+IPM on penicillin binding protein (PBP) synthesis, molecular studies were performed, with results showing that FOF+IPM treatment significantly decreased PBP1, PBP2 (but not PBP2a), and PBP3 synthesis. These results allow clinicians to consider the use of FOF+IPM or FOF+CRO to treat MRSA or GISA IE.Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Note: Reproducció del postprint publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02139-15
It is part of: Antimicrobial Agents And Chemotherapy, 2015, vol 60, num 1, p. 478-486
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/184262
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02139-15
ISSN: 1098-6596
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12474_2030417_aac02139-15_clean_revised__manuscript.pdf387.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.