Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/185409
Title: Scar channels in cardiac magnetic resonance to predict appropriate therapies in primary prevention.
Author: Sanchez Somonte, Paula
Quinto, Levio
Garre, Paz
Zaraket, Fatima
Alarcón, Francisco
Borràs, Roger
Caixal, Gala
Vázquez, Sara
Prat González, Susanna
Ortiz Pérez, José Tomás
Perea Palazón, Rosario Jesús
Guasch i Casany, Eduard
Tolosana, José M. (José María)
Berruezo Sánchez, Antonio
Arbelo, Elena
Sitges Carreño, Marta
Mont Girbau, Lluís
Roca Luque, Ivo
Keywords: Malalties del cor
Arrítmia
Desfibril·ladors cardioversors implantables
Ressonància magnètica
Cicatrius
Ventricles cardíacs
Medicina preventiva
Heart diseases
Arrhythmia
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Magnetic resonance
Scars
Ventricle of heart
Preventive medicine
Issue Date: 21-Apr-2021
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract: Background Scar characteristics analyzed by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) are related with ventricular arrhythmias. Current guidelines are based only on the left ventricular ejection fraction to recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in primary prevention. Objectives Our study aims to analyze the role of imaging to stratify arrhythmogenic risk in patients with ICD for primary prevention. Methods From 2006 to 2017, we included 200 patients with LGE-CMR before ICD implantation for primary prevention. The scar, border zone, core, and conducting channels (CCs) were automatically measured by a dedicated software. Results The mean age was 60.9 ± 10.9 years; 81.5% (163) were men; 52% (104) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 29% ± 10.1%. After a follow-up of 4.6 ± 2 years, 46 patients (22%) reached the primary end point (appropriate ICD therapy). Scar mass (36.2 ± 19 g vs 21.7 ± 10 g; P < .001), border zone mass (26.4 ± 12.5 g vs 16.0 ± 9.5 g; P < .001), core mass (9.9 ± 8.6 g vs 5.5 ± 5.7 g; P < .001), and CC mass (3.0 ± 2.6 g vs 1.6 ± 2.3 g; P < .001) were associated with appropriate therapies. Scar mass > 10 g (25.31% vs 5.26%; hazard ratio 4.74; P = .034) and the presence of CCs (34.75% vs 8.93%; hazard ratio 4.07; P = .003) were also strongly associated with the primary end point. However, patients without channels and with scar mass < 10 g had a very low rate of appropriate therapies (2.8%). Conclusion Scar characteristics analyzed by LGE-CMR are strong predictors of appropriate therapies in patients with ICD in primary prevention. The absence of channels and scar mass < 10 g can identify patients at a very low risk of ventricular arrhythmias in this population.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.04.017
It is part of: Heart Rhythm, 2021, vol. 18, num. 8, p. 1336-1343
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/185409
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.04.017
ISSN: 1547-5271
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
720349.pdf822.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons