Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/191785
Title: Immunogenicity and safety of one-dose human papillomavirus vaccine compared with two or three doses in Tanzanian girls (DoRIS): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial
Author: Watson Jones, Deborah
Changalucha, John
Whitworth, Hilary
Pinto, Ligia
Mutani, Paul
Indangasi, Jackton
Kemp, Troy
Hashim, Ramadhan
Kamala, Beatrice
Wiggins, Rebecca
Songoro, Twaib
Connor, Nicholas
Mbwanji, Gladys
Pavon, Miquel A.
Lowe, Brett
Mmbando, Devis
Kapiga, Saidi
Mayaud, Philippe
De Sanjosé, Silvia
Dillner, Joakim
Hayes, Richard J
Lacey, Charles J
Baisley, Kathy
Keywords: Papil·lomavirus
Immunogenètica
Papillomaviruses
Immunogenetics
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Abstract: Background An estimated 15% of girls aged 9-14 years worldwide have been vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) with the recommended two-dose or three-dose schedules. A one-dose HPV vaccine schedule would be simpler and cheaper to deliver. We report immunogenicity and safety results of different doses of two different HPV vaccines in Tanzanian girls. Methods In this open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled healthy schoolgirls aged 9-14 years from Government schools in Mwanza, Tanzania. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive one, two, or three doses of either the 2-valent vaccine (Cervarix, GSK Biologicals, Rixensart) or the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon). The primary outcome was HPV 16 specific or HPV 18 specific seropositivity following one dose compared with two or three doses of the same HPV vaccine 24 months after vaccination. Safety was assessed as solicited adverse events up to 30 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 24 months after vaccination or to last study visit. The primary outcome was done in the per-protocol population, and safety was analysed in the total vaccinated population. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02834637. Findings Between Feb 23, 2017, and Jan 6, 2018, we screened 1002 girls for eligibility. 72 girls were excluded. 930 girls were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive one dose of Cervarix (155 participants), two doses of Cervarix (155 participants), three doses of Cervarix (155 participants), one dose of Gardasil-9 (155 participants), two doses of Gardasil-9 (155 participants), or three doses of Gardasil-9 (155 participants). 922 participants received all scheduled doses within the defined window (three withdrew, one was lost to follow-up, and one died before completion; two received their 6-month doses early, and one received the wrong valent vaccine in error; all 930 participants were included in the total vaccinated cohort). Retention at 24 months was 918 (99%) of 930 participants. In the accordingto-protocol cohort, at 24 months, 99% of participants who received one dose of either HPV vaccine were seropositive for HPV 16 IgG antibodies, compared with 100% of participants who received two doses, and 100% of participants who received three doses. This met the prespecified non-inferiority criteria. Anti-HPV 18 seropositivity at 24 months did not meet non-inferiority criteria for one dose compared to two doses or three doses for either vaccine, although more than 98% of girls in all groups had HPV 18 antibodies. 53 serious adverse events (SAEs) were experienced by 42 (4.5%) of 930 girls, the most common of which was hospital admission for malaria. One girl died of malaria. Number of events was similar between groups and no SAEs were considered related to vaccination. Interpretation A single dose of the 2-valent or 9-valent HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years induced robust immune responses up to 24 months, suggesting that this reduced dose regimen could be suitable for prevention of HPV infection among girls in the target age group for vaccination. Copyright (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.Y
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00309-6
It is part of: The Lancet Global Health, 2022, vol. 10, issue. 10, p. e1473-e1484
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/191785
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00309-6
ISSN: 2214-109X
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PIIS2214109X22003096.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons