Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/193148
Title: Palbociclib Rechallenge for Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Findings from the Phase II BioPER Trial
Author: Albanell Mestres, Joan
Pérez García, José Manuel
Gil Gil, Miguel
Curigliano, Giuseppe
Ruíz Borrego, Manuel
Comerma, Laura
Gibert, Joan
Bellet, Meritxell
Bermejo, Begoña
Calvo, Lourdes
Haba, Juan de la
Espinosa, Enrique
Minisini, Alessandro Marco
Quiroga Garcia, Vanesa
Santaballa Bertran, Ana
Mina, Leonardo
Bellosillo Paricio, Beatriz
Rojo, Federico
Menéndez, Silvia
Sampayo Cordero, Miguel
Popa, Crina
Malfettone, Andrea
Cortés, Javier
Llombart Cussac, Antonio
Keywords: Càncer de mama
Assaigs clínics
Marcadors bioquímics
Breast cancer
Clinical trials
Biochemical markers
Issue Date: 27-Sep-2022
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the efficacy and exploratory biomarkers of continuing palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) beyond pro-gression on prior palbociclib-based regimen in patients with hor-mone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).Patients and Methods: The multicenter, open-label, phase II BioPER trial included women who had experienced a progressive disease (PD) after having achieved clinical benefit on the immedi-ately prior palbociclib plus ET regimen. Palbociclib (125 mg, 100 mg, or 75 mg daily orally for 3 weeks and 1 week off as per prior palbociclib-based regimen) plus ET of physician's choice were administered in 4-week cycles until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Coprimary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR) and percent-age of tumors with baseline loss of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein expression. Additional endpoints included safety and biomarker analysis.Results: Among 33 patients enrolled, CBR was 34.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.6-53.2; P < 0.001] and 13.0% of tumors (95% CI, 5.2-27.5) showed loss of Rb protein expression, meeting both coprimary endpoints. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.8-6.7). No new safety signals were reported. A signature that included baseline mediators of therapeutic resistance to palbociclib and ET (low Rb score, high cyclin E1 score, ESR1 mutation) was independently associated with shorter median progression-free survival (HR, 22.0; 95% CI, 1.71-282.9; P = 0.018). Conclusions: Maintaining palbociclib after progression on prior palbociclib-based regimen seems to be a reasonable, investigational approach for selected patients. A composite biomarker signature predicts a subset of patients who may not derive a greater benefit from palbociclib rechallenge, warranting further validation in larger randomized controlled trials.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1281
It is part of: Clinical Cancer Research, 2022, vol. 29, num. 1, p. 67-80
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/193148
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1281
ISSN: 1078-0432
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
67.pdf18.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons