Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/195064
Title: Forty-Year Trends in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infective Endocarditis
Author: Hernández-Meneses, Marta
Llopis Pérez, Jaime
Sandoval, Elena
Ninot, Salvador
Almela, M. (Manel)
Falces, Carlos
Pericàs, Juan M.
Vidal, Barbara
Perissinotti, Andrés
Marco Reverté, Francesc
Mestres, Carlos A.
Pare i Bardera, J. Carles
García de la María, Cristina
Cuervo Requena, Guillermo
Quintana, Eduard
Tolosana, José M. (José María)
Moreno Camacho, Ma. Asunción
Miró Meda, José M.
Hospital Clinic Infective Endocarditis Team Investigators
Keywords: Pronòstic mèdic
Epidemiologia
Endocarditis
Prognosis
Epidemiology
Endocarditis
Issue Date: 14-Oct-2022
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract: Background: Studies investigating cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) epidemiological changes and prognosis over long periods of time are lacking. Methods: Retrospective single cardiovascular surgery center cohort study of definite CIED-IE episodes between 1981-2020. A comparative analysis of two periods (1981-2000 vs 2001-2020) was conducted to analyze changes in epidemiology and outcome over time. Results: One-hundred and thirty-eight CIED-IE episodes were diagnosed: 25 (18%) first period and 113 (82%) second. CIED-IE was 4.5 times more frequent in the second period, especially in implantable cardiac defibrillators. Age (63 [53-70] vs 71 [63-76] years, P < .01), comorbidities (CCI 3.0 [2-4] vs 4.5 [3-6], P > .01), nosocomial infections (4% vs 15.9%, P = .02) and transfers from other centers (8% vs 41.6%, P < .01) were significantly more frequent in the second period, as were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal (MR-CoNS) (0% vs 13.3%, P < .01) and Enterococcus spp. (0% vs 5.3%, P = .01) infections, pulmonary embolism (0% vs 10.6%, P < .01) and heart failure (12% vs 28.3%, p < .01). Second period surgery rates were lower (96% vs 87.6%, P = .09), and there were no differences in in-hospital (20% vs 11.5%, P = .11) and one-year mortalities (24% vs 15%, P = .33), or relapses (8% vs 5.3%, P = 0.65). Multivariate analysis showed Charlson index (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]; 1.5 [1.16-1.94]) and septic shock (23.09 [4.57-116.67]) were associated with a worse prognosis, whereas device removal (0.11 [.02-.57]), transfers (0.13 [.02-0.95]), and second-period diagnosis (0.13 [.02-.71]) were associated with better one-year outcomes. Conclusions: CIED-IE episodes increased more than four-fold during last 40 years. Despite CIED-IE involved an older population with more comorbidities, antibiotic-resistant MR-CoNS, and complex devices, one-year survival improved.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac547
It is part of: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2022, vol. 9, num. 11, p. 1-11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/195064
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac547
ISSN: 2328-8957
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
729627.pdf1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons