Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Optimisation of biological nitrogen removal processes to treat reject water from anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
Author: Galí Serra, Alexandre
Director/Tutor: Mata Álvarez, Joan
Keywords: Depuració d'aigües residuals
Purification of sewage
Issue Date: 3-Oct-2006
Publisher: Universitat de Barcelona
Abstract: [eng] In the present work, the biological treatment of real reject water (800 mg NH4+-N L-1) from anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge from a waste water treatment plant (WWTP) is carried out. The process was optimised with a Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) of 3 L using methanol for denitrification due to the lack of a readily biodegradable organic carbon source. Process kinetics were compared through the specific Ammonium Uptake Rate (sAUR) finding the appropriate operational sequence at 32ºC with an 8 hour cycle length. Every operational cycle was carried out with a solid retention time (SRT) of 11 days, hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 1 day and 2500 mg VSS L-1. In order to avoid nitrate formation, and thus to save costs, the oxygen concentration was maintained below 1 mg L-1 during the aerobic periods and pH remained within an optimal range (7.5-8.5) alternating different aerobic/anoxic sub-cycles inside the operational cycle. The total nitrogen removal was 0.8-0.9 kg N day-1 m-3. In order to make the process more economical metanol was substitute for the primary hidrolysate of the own WWTP obtaining a total nitrogen removal of 0.7 kg N day-1 m-3. The use of primary hidrolysate would lead to a cost reduction of 0.2-0.3 kg -1 N removed. The next step was to compare the SBR technology to obtain the nitrite route with the continuous technology using a chemostat reactor. In that a chemostat SHARON (Single-reactor High activity Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite) continuous reactor (4 L) was operated to develop the biological nitrogen removal via nitrite of reject water at 33 ºC. Methanol was added for denitrification In the same chemostat took place nitrification and denitrification alternating periods of 1 hour with a total HRT of 2. As a conclusion, the SBR would be a slightly cheaper process (1.01 versus 1.28 kg -1 N) due to the higher volumetric reaction rates and the SHARON process is a more stable system.
ISBN: 8469021311
Appears in Collections:Tesis Doctorals - Departament - Enginyeria Química i Metal·lúrgia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
00.AGS_PREVIOUS.pdf134.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
01.AGS_CHAPTERS_1_TO_12.pdf6.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
02.AGS_ANNEXES.pdf653.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03.AGS_PUBLICATIONS.pdf113.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
04.AGS_MEMORIA.pdf115.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.