Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/48337
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Vílchez Pérez, Miguel-Ángel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sancho Puchades, Manuel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Valmaseda Castellón, Eduardo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Paredes García, Jordi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Berini Aytés, Leonardo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gay Escoda, Cosme | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-12-05T11:51:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-12-05T11:51:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-03-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1698-4447 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/48337 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine and 4% articaine (both with 1:200.000 adrenaline) for anterior maxillary infiltration in healthy volunteers. Material and methods: A triple-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial was carried out in 20 volunteers. A supraperiosteal buccal injection of 0.9 ml of either solution at the apex of the lateral incisor was done in 2 appointments separated 2 weeks apart. The following outcome variables were measured: latency time, anesthetic efficacy (dental pulp, keratinized gingiva, alveolar mucosa and upper lip mucosa and tissue) and the duration of anesthetic effect. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored during the procedure. Results: Latency time recorded was similar for both anesthetic solutions (p>0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of anesthetic efficacy for dental pulp, keratinized gingiva or alveolar mucosa. Articaine had a significant higher proportion of successful anesthesia at 10 minutes after infiltration in lip mucosa and lip skin (p=0.039). The duration of anesthesia was 336 minutes for bupivacaine and 167 minutes for articaine. (p<0.001). No significant hemodynamic alterations were noted during the procedure. Conclusions: Articaine and bupivacaine exhibited similar anesthetic efficacy for maxillary infiltrations. The duration of anesthesia was longer with the bupivacaine solution, but lip anesthesia was better with articaine | - |
dc.format.extent | 6 p. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Medicina Oral SL | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17476 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2012, vol. 17, num. 2, p. 325-330 | - |
dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17476 | - |
dc.rights | (c) Medicina Oral SL, 2012 | - |
dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Maxil·lars | - |
dc.subject.classification | Anestèsia en odontologia | - |
dc.subject.classification | Injeccions | - |
dc.subject.classification | Anestèsia local | - |
dc.subject.classification | Amides | - |
dc.subject.other | Jaws | - |
dc.subject.other | Anesthesia in dentistry | - |
dc.subject.other | Injections | - |
dc.subject.other | Local anesthesia | - |
dc.subject.other | Amides | - |
dc.title | A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparison of articaine and bupivacaine for maxillary infiltrations | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 609676 | - |
dc.date.updated | 2013-12-05T11:51:19Z | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22143708 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia) Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
609676.pdf | 845.8 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.