Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/49283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Díaz, Inmaculada-
dc.contributor.authorHermo Outeiral, Ma. del Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorBallesteros, Óscar-
dc.contributor.authorZafra-Gómez, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorBarrón Bueno, Dolores-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa Torralbo, José-
dc.contributor.authorNavalón, Alberto-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-30T11:49:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-30T11:49:54Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn0009-5893-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/49283-
dc.description.abstractThis work presents a comparison between three analytical methods developed for the simultaneous determination of eight quinolones regulated by the European Union (marbofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, difloxacin, sarafloxacin, oxolinic acid and flumequine) in pig muscle, using liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (LC-FD), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The procedures involve an extraction of the quinolones from the tissues, a step for clean-up and preconcentration of the analytes by solid-phase extraction and a subsequent liquid chromatographic analysis. The limits of detection of the methods ranged from 0.1 to 2.1 ng g−1 using LC-FD, from 0.3 to 1.8 using LC-MS and from 0.2 to 0.3 using LC-MS/MS, while inter- and intra-day variability was under 15 % in all cases. Most of those data are notably lower than the maximum residue limits established by the European Union for quinolones in pig tissues. The methods have been applied for the determination of quinolones in six different commercial pig muscle samples purchased in different supermarkets located in the city of Granada (south-east Spain).-
dc.format.extent16 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2435-5-
dc.relation.ispartofChromatographia, 2013, vol. 76, num. 11-12, p. 707-713-
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2435-5-
dc.rights(c) Springer Verlag, 2013-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)-
dc.subject.classificationCromatografia de líquids-
dc.subject.classificationFluorescència-
dc.subject.classificationEspectrometria de masses-
dc.subject.classificationQuinolones-
dc.subject.classificationPorc-
dc.subject.classificationMúsculs-
dc.subject.otherLiquid chromatography-
dc.subject.otherFluorescence-
dc.subject.otherMass spectrometry-
dc.subject.otherQuinolone antibacterial agents-
dc.subject.otherSwine-
dc.subject.otherMuscles-
dc.titleComparison of three analytical methods for the determination of quinolones in pig muscle samples-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec621475-
dc.date.updated2014-01-30T11:49:54Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
621475.pdf112.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.