Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/51585
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chacón Moscoso, Salvador | - |
dc.contributor.author | Anguera Argilaga, María Teresa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanduvete Chaves, Susana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez Aroca, Montse | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-13T11:34:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-13T11:34:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0214-9915 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2445/51585 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Nowadays, the confronting dichotomous view between experimental/quasi-experimental and non-experimental/ethnographic studies still exists but, despite the extensive use of non-experimental/ ethnographic studies, the most systematic work on methodological quality has been developed based on experimental and quasi-experimental studies. This hinders evaluators and planners" practice of empirical program evaluation, a sphere in which the distinction between types of study is changing continually and is less clear. Method: Based on the classical validity framework of experimental/quasi-experimental studies, we carry out a review of the literature in order to analyze the convergence of design elements in methodological quality in primary studies in systematic reviews and ethnographic research. Results: We specify the relevant design elements that should be taken into account in order to improve validity and generalization in program evaluation practice in different methodologies from a practical methodological and complementary view. Conclusions: We recommend ways to improve design elements so as to enhance validity and generalization in program evaluation practice. | - |
dc.format.extent | 6 p. | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias | - |
dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: 10.7334/psicothema2013.144 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psicothema, 2013, vol. 26, num. 1, p. 91-96 | - |
dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.144 | - |
dc.rights | (c) Psicothema, 2013 | - |
dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) | - |
dc.subject.classification | Recerca | - |
dc.subject.classification | Avaluació de programes | - |
dc.subject.classification | Metodologia | - |
dc.subject.other | Research | - |
dc.subject.other | Programs evaluation | - |
dc.subject.other | Methodology | - |
dc.title | Methodological convergence of program evaluation designs | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 629248 | - |
dc.date.updated | 2014-03-13T11:34:56Z | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
629248.pdf | 477.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.