Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/56234
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Francisca C.-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Gracia, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorCampos, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorRozas Liras, Julio A.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-23T10:10:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-23T10:10:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1759-6653-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/56234-
dc.description.abstractGene turnover rates and the evolution of gene family sizes are important aspects of genome evolution. Here, we use curated sequence data of the major chemosensory gene families from Drosophila-the gustatory receptor, odorant receptor, ionotropic receptor, and odorant-binding protein families-to conduct a comparative analysis among families, exploring different methods to estimate gene birth and death rates, including an ad hoc simulation study. Remarkably, we found that the state-of-the-art methods may produce very different rate estimates, which may lead to disparate conclusions regarding the evolution of chemosensory gene family sizes in Drosophila. Among biological factors, we found that a peculiarity of D. sechellia's gene turnover rates was a major source of bias in global estimates, whereas gene conversion had negligible effects for the families analyzed herein. Turnover rates vary considerably among families, subfamilies, and ortholog groups although all analyzed families were quite dynamic in terms of gene turnover. Computer simulations showed that the methods that use ortholog group information appear to be the most accurate for the Drosophila chemosensory families. Most importantly, these results reveal the potential of rate heterogeneity among lineages to severely bias some turnover rate estimation methods and the need of further evaluating the performance of these methods in a more diverse sampling of gene families and phylogenetic contexts. Using branch-specific codon substitution models, we find further evidence of positive selection in recently duplicated genes, which attests to a nonneutral aspect of the gene birth-and-death process.-
dc.format.extent14 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu130-
dc.relation.ispartofGenome Biology and Evolution, 2014, vol. 6, num. 7, p. 1669-1682-
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu130-
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Almeida, Francisca C. et al., 2014-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)-
dc.subject.classificationGenòmica-
dc.subject.classificationGenètica evolutiva-
dc.subject.classificationDrosòfila-
dc.subject.otherGenomics-
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary genetics-
dc.subject.otherDrosophila-
dc.titleFamily Size Evolution in Drosophila Chemosensory Gene Families: A Comparative Analysis with a Critical Appraisal of Methods-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec642713-
dc.date.updated2014-07-23T10:10:38Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid24951565-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
642713.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons