Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/59586
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeguí, Miquel A.-
dc.contributor.authorCrespo, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorCortés, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLluch Hernández, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorBrosa, Max-
dc.contributor.authorBecerra, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorChiavenna, S. M.-
dc.contributor.authorGracia, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-11T13:18:35Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-31T23:01:52Z-
dc.date.issued2014-12-
dc.identifier.issn1473-7167-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/59586-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cost<br>effectiveness analysis of MammaPrint® (70-gene signature) in the diagnosis of early breast cancer as a prognosis assay to study the risk of tumor recurrence to administer adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Markov model assuming a cohort of 60-year-old women with breast cancer. Treatment costs and effects were assessed by comparing the 5-year, 10-year and lifetime risk of recurrence using Adjuvant! Online® (online algorithm), 70-gene signature or Oncotype DX® (21-gene assay). Results: 70-gene signature showed a life expectancy of 23.55 years at lifetime. Life expectancy was lower for 21-gene assay and online algorithm, with associated quality-adjusted life year gains up to 0.23 and 0.75, respectively, with 70-gene signature. At year 5, the mean cost of 21-gene assay, 70-gene signature and online algorithm was 7100, 6380 and 4580, respectively. 70-gene signature was dominant versus 21-gene assay at any time horizon and would be cost<br>effective from year 7 versus online algorithm (lifetime: 1457 per quality-adjusted life years gained). Conclusions: 70-gene signature was a dominant strategy over 21-gene assay and was highly cost<br>effective versus online algorithm.-
dc.format.extent36 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2014.957185-
dc.relation.ispartofExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2014, vol. 14, num. 6, p. 889-899-
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2014.957185-
dc.rights(c) Informa Healthcare, 2014-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de mama-
dc.subject.classificationGenòmica-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi econòmica-
dc.subject.classificationSalut pública-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi cost-benefici-
dc.subject.classificationEspanya-
dc.subject.otherBreast cancer-
dc.subject.otherGenomics-
dc.subject.otherEconomic analysis-
dc.subject.otherPublic health-
dc.subject.otherCost effectiveness-
dc.subject.otherSpain-
dc.titleGenomic profile of breast cancer: cost effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec643106-
dc.date.updated2014-11-11T13:18:36Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
643106.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.