Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/69197
Title: Economic Evaluation of an Alternative Drug to Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine as Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy
Author: Sicuri, Elisa
Fernandes, Silke
Macete, Eusébio
González, Raquel
Mombo-Ngoma, Ghyslain
Massougbodji, Achille
Abdulla, Salim
Kuwawenaruwa, August
Katana, Abraham
Desai, Meghna
Cot, Michel
Ramharter, Michael
Kremsner, Peter
Slutsker, Laurence
Aponte, John J.
Hanson, Kara
Menéndez, Clara
Keywords: Malària
Persones seropositives
Embaràs
Assaigs clínics
Malaria
HIV-positive persons
Pregnancy
Clinical trials
Issue Date: 27-Apr-2015
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Abstract: Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended in HIV-negative women to avert malaria, while this relies on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (CTXp) in HIV-positive women. Alternative antimalarials are required in areas where parasite resistance to antifolate drugs is high. The cost-effectiveness of IPTp with alternative drugs is needed to inform policy. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of 2-dose IPTp-mefloquine (MQ) was compared with IPTp-SP in HIV-negative women (Benin, Gabon, Mozambique and Tanzania). In HIV-positive women the cost-effectiveness of 3-dose IPTp-MQ added to CTXp was compared with CTXp alone (Kenya, Mozambique and Tanzania). The outcomes used were maternal clinical malaria, anaemia at delivery and non-obstetric hospital admissions. The poor tolerability to MQ was included as the value of women's loss of working days. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and threshold analysis undertaken. RESULTS: For HIV-negative women, the ICER for IPTp-MQ versus IPTp-SP was 136.30 US$ (2012 US$) (95%CI 131.41; 141.18) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted, or 237.78 US$ (95%CI 230.99; 244.57), depending on whether estimates from Gabon were included or not. For HIV-positive women, the ICER per DALY averted for IPTp-MQ added to CTXp, versus CTXp alone was 6.96 US$ (95%CI 4.22; 9.70). In HIV-negative women, moderate shifts of variables such as malaria incidence, drug cost, and IPTp efficacy increased the ICERs above the cost-effectiveness threshold. In HIV-positive women the intervention remained cost-effective for a substantial (up to 21 times) increase in cost per tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of IPTp with an effective antimalarial to CTXp was very cost-effective in HIV-positive women. IPTp with an efficacious antimalarial was more cost-effective than IPTp-SP in HIV-negative women. However, the poor tolerability of MQ does not favour its use as IPTp. Regardless of HIV status, prevention of malaria in pregnancy with a highly efficacious, well tolerated antimalarial would be cost-effective despite its high price. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00811421; Pan African Trials Registry PACTR2010020001429343 and PACTR2010020001813440.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125072
It is part of: PLoS One, 2015, vol. 10, num. 4, p. e0125072
Related resource: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125072
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/69197
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sicuri2015_1870.pdf2.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons