Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/69206
Title: Can Economic Analysis Contribute to Disease Elimination and Eradication? A Systematic Review
Author: Sicuri, Elisa
Evans, David B.
Tediosi, Fabrizio
Keywords: Medicina preventiva
Malalties infeccioses
Cerca documental en línia
Anàlisi econòmica
Preventive medicine
Communicable diseases
Online bibliographic searching
Economic analysis
Issue Date: 12-Jun-2015
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases elimination and eradication have become important areas of focus for global health and countries. Due to the substantial up-front investments required to eliminate and eradicate, and the overall shortage of resources for health, economic analysis can inform decision making on whether elimination/eradication makes economic sense and on the costs and benefits of alternative strategies. In order to draw lessons for current and future initiatives, we review the economic literature that has addressed questions related to the elimination and eradication of infectious diseases focusing on: why, how and for whom? METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching economic literature (cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and economic impact analyses) on elimination/eradication of infectious diseases published from 1980 to 2013 from three large bibliographic databases: one general (SCOPUS), one bio-medical (MEDLINE/PUBMED) and one economic (IDEAS/REPEC). RESULTS: A total of 690 non-duplicate papers were identified from which only 43 met the inclusion criteria. In addition, only one paper focusing on equity issues, the "for whom?" question, was found. The literature relating to "why?" is the largest, much of it focusing on how much it would cost. A more limited literature estimates the benefits in terms of impact on economic growth with mixed results. The question of how to eradicate or eliminate was informed by an economic literature highlighting that there will be opportunities for individuals and countries to free-ride and that forms of incentives and/or disincentives will be needed. This requires government involvement at country level and global coordination. While there is little doubt that eliminating infectious diseases will eventually improve equity, it will only happen if active steps to promote equity are followed on the path to elimination and eradication. CONCLUSION: The largest part of the literature has focused on costs and economic benefits of elimination/eradication. To a lesser extent, challenges associated with achieving elimination/eradication and ensuring equity have also been explored. Although elimination and eradication are, for some diseases, good investments compared with control, countries' incentives to eliminate do not always align with the global good and the most efficient elimination strategies may not prioritize the poorest populations. For any infectious disease, policy-makers will need to consider realigning contrasting incentives between the individual countries and the global community and to assure that the process towards elimination/eradication considers equity.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130603
It is part of: PloS one, 2015, vol. 10, num. 6, p. e0130603
Related resource: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130603
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/69206
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sicuri2015_1905.pdf729.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons