Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/97184
Title: Quality of life impact of primary treatments for localized prostate cancer patients without hormonal treatment
Author: Pardo, Yolanda
Guedea Edo, Ferran
Aguiló, Ferrán
Fernández, Pablo
Macías, Víctor
Mariño, Alfonso
Hervás, Asunción
Herruzo, Ismael
Ortiz, María José
Ponce de León, Javier
Craven-Bratle, Jordi
Suárez, José Francisco
Boladeras, Ana
Pont, Àngels
Ayala, Adriana
Sancho, Gemma
Martínez, Evelyn
Alonso, Jordi
Ferrer, Montserrat
Keywords: Càncer de pròstata
Qualitat de vida
Hormonoteràpia
Prostatectomia
Radioteràpia
Prostate cancer
Quality of life
Hormone therapy
Prostatectomy
Radiotherapy
Issue Date: 4-Oct-2010
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology
Abstract: Purpose Earlier studies evaluating the effect on quality of life (QoL) of localized prostate cancer interventions included patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy, which could have affected their outcomes. Our objective was to compare the QoL impact of the three most common primary treatments on patients who were not receiving adjuvant hormonal treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 435 patients treated with radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. QoL was assessed before and after treatment with the Short Form-36 and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Differences between groups were tested by analysis of variance. Distribution of outcome at 3 years was examined by stratifying according to baseline status. Generalized estimating equation models were constructed to assess the effect of treatment over time. RESULTS: Compared with the brachytherapy group, the prostatectomy group showed greater deterioration on urinary incontinence and sexual scores but better urinary irritative-obstructive results (-18.22, -13.19, and +6.38, respectively, at 3 years; P < .001). In patients with urinary irritative-obstructive symptoms at baseline, improvement was observed in 64% of those treated with nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Higher bowel worsening (-2.87, P = .04) was observed in the external radiotherapy group, with 20% of patients reporting bowel symptoms. CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy caused urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction but improved pre-existing urinary irritative-obstructive symptoms. External radiotherapy and brachytherapy caused urinary irritative-obstructive adverse effects and some sexual dysfunction. External radiotherapy also caused bowel adverse effects. Relevant differences between treatment groups persisted for up to 3 years of follow-up, although the difference in sexual adverse effects between brachytherapy and prostatectomy tended to decline over long-term follow-up. These results provide valuable information for clinical decision making.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3245
It is part of: Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010, vol. 28, num. 31, p. 4687-4696
Related resource: http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3245
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/97184
ISSN: 0732-183X
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
620187.pdf181.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.