Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/98669
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Cláudia-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Puchol, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorPons, Maria J.-
dc.contributor.authorBazan, Jorge-
dc.contributor.authorTinco-Valdez, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorValle Mendoza, Juana del-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Joaquim-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-19T08:42:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-19T08:42:34Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-09-
dc.identifier.issn1935-2727-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/98669-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The lack of an effective diagnostic tool for Carrion's disease leads to misdiagnosis, wrong treatments and perpetuation of asymptomatic carriers living in endemic areas. Conventional PCR approaches have been reported as a diagnostic technique. However, the detection limit of these techniques is not clear as well as if its usefulness in low bacteriemia cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection limit of 3 PCR approaches. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We determined the detection limit of 3 different PCR approaches: Bartonella-specific 16S rRNA, fla and its genes. We also evaluated the viability of dry blood spots to be used as a sample transport system. Our results show that 16S rRNA PCR is the approach with a lowest detection limit, 5 CFU/muL, and thus, the best diagnostic PCR tool studied. Dry blood spots diminish the sensitivity of the assay. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: From the tested PCRs, the 16S rRNA PCR-approach is the best to be used in the direct blood detection of acute cases of Carrion's disease. However its use in samples from dry blood spots results in easier management of transport samples in rural areas, a slight decrease in the sensitivity was observed. The usefulness to detect by PCR the presence of low-bacteriemic or asymptomatic carriers is doubtful, showing the need to search for new more sensible techniques.-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004529-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2016, vol. 10, num. 3, p. e0004529-
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004529-
dc.rightscc by (c) Gomes et al., 2016-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)-
dc.subject.classificationBiologia molecular-
dc.subject.classificationBiopolímers-
dc.subject.otherMolecular biology-
dc.subject.otherBiopolymers-
dc.titleEvaluation of PCR Approaches for Detection of Bartonella bacilliformis in Blood Samples-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec704383-
dc.date.updated2016-05-10T15:02:27Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid26959642-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
gomes2016_2095.pdf217.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons