Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/111898
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNovick, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, William-
dc.contributor.authorHaro Abad, Josep Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMoneta, Maria Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Gang-
dc.contributor.authorYue, Li-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Jihyung-
dc.contributor.authorDueñas, Héctor-
dc.contributor.authorBrugnoli, Roberto-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-01T14:53:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-01T14:53:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-23-
dc.identifier.issn1176-6328-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/111898-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To assess and compare the levels of functioning in patients with major depressive disorder treated with either duloxetine with a daily dose of ≤60 mg or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) as monotherapy for up to 6 months in a naturalistic setting in East Asia. In addition, this study examined the impact of painful physical symptoms (PPS) on the effects of these treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for this post hoc analysis were taken from a 6-month prospective observational study involving 1,549 patients with major depressive disorder without sexual dysfunction. The present analysis focused on a subgroup of patients from East Asia (n=587). Functioning was measured using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Depression severity was assessed using the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report. PPS were rated using the modified Somatic Symptom Inventory. A mixed model with repeated measures was fitted to compare the levels of functioning between duloxetine-treated (n=227) and SSRI-treated (n=225) patients, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: The mean SDS total score was similar between the two treatment cohorts (15.46 [standard deviation =6.11] in the duloxetine cohort and 16.36 [standard deviation =6.53] in the SSRI cohort, P=0.077) at baseline. Both descriptive and regression analyses confirmed improvement in functioning in both groups during follow-up, but duloxetine-treated patients achieved better functioning. At 24 weeks, the estimated mean SDS total score was 4.48 (standard error =0.80) in the duloxetine cohort, which was statistically significantly lower (ie, better functioning) than that of 6.76 (standard error =0.77) in the SSRI cohort (P<0.001). This treatment difference was more apparent in the subgroup of patients with PPS at baseline. Similar patterns were also observed for SDS subscores (work, social life, and family life). CONCLUSION: Depressed patients treated with duloxetine achieved better functioning compared to those treated with SSRIs. This treatment difference was mostly driven by patients with PPS at baseline.-
dc.format.extent10 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherDove Medical Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S100675-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychiatric Disease And Treatment, 2016, vol. 12, p. 383-392-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S100675-
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Novick, Diego et al., 2016-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)-
dc.subject.classificationDepressió psíquica-
dc.subject.classificationAntidepressius-
dc.subject.classificationSerotonina-
dc.subject.classificationÀsia de l'est-
dc.subject.otherMental depression-
dc.subject.otherAntidepressants-
dc.subject.otherSerotonin-
dc.subject.otherEast Asia-
dc.titleFunctioning in patients with major depression treated with duloxetine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in East Asia-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec667859-
dc.date.updated2017-06-01T14:53:01Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid26966361-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
667859.pdf595.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons