Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/112644
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez Díaz, Esperanza-
dc.contributor.authorSilva Cotta, Jose-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Negrete, Francisco J.-
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez Ortiz, Consuelo-
dc.contributor.authorMorgan Warren, Robert J.-
dc.contributor.authorMaltman, John-
dc.contributor.authorMillá, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorGIFT study group-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-20T17:12:58Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-20T17:12:58Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-10-
dc.identifier.issn1177-5467-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/112644-
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare a fixed combination of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.5% timolol (BTFC) with latanoprost monotherapy (LM) in treatment-naïve patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and risk factors for glaucomatous progression. Methods Patients were enrolled at 15 sites in Spain and Portugal, and were randomized 1:1 to BTFC or LM. Patients instilled one drop of medication once per day at 8 pm for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 weeks. Results Of 81 patients enrolled, 43 were randomized to BTFC and 38 to LM. Mean (SD) change in IOP from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater for BTFC than for LM: −13.5 mmHg (4.48) versus −11.4 mmHg (3.19), respectively (P=0.003). Similarly, at 12 weeks, significantly more BTFC patients than LM patients had IOP reductions of ≥40% (74.4% versus 47.4%, P=0.015) or ≥50% (46.5% versus 15.8%, P=0.003). Adverse events were more frequent with BTFC than with LM (33 versus 13 events), but most were mild in severity. The only serious adverse event (colon cancer) was adjudged unrelated to the study medication. Conclusion BTFC was effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve patients with OAG at high risk of progression-
dc.format.extent8 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherDove Medical Press-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Ophthalmology, 2014, vol. 8, p. 725-732-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S56735-
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Gutierrez Díaz, Esperanza et al., 2014-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)-
dc.subject.classificationGlaucoma-
dc.subject.classificationTerapèutica oftalmològica-
dc.subject.classificationOftalmologia-
dc.subject.otherGlaucoma-
dc.subject.otherOphthalmological therapeutics-
dc.subject.otherOphthalmology-
dc.titleBimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in treatment-naïve glaucoma patients at high risk of progression: a pilot study.-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec665413-
dc.date.updated2017-06-20T17:12:58Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid24748767-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
665413.pdf309.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons