Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/117282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBinefa i Rodríguez, Gemma-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Martínez, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorMilà, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorFernández Muñoz, Esteve-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Moranta, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorGonzalo Diego, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorBenito-Aracil, Llúcia-
dc.contributor.authorClopés Estela, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorGuardiola, Jordi-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Aguado, Víctor-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T14:00:11Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T14:00:11Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-20-
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/117282-
dc.descriptionA l'article en PDF consta com a vol. 5-
dc.description.abstractEffective quality assurance is essential in any screening programme. This article provides a unique insight into key quality indicators of five rounds of the first population-based colorectal cancer screening programme implemented in Spain (2000-2012), providing the results according to the type of screening (prevalent or first screen and incident or subsequent screen) and test (guaiac or immunochemical). The total crude participation rate increased from 17.2% (11,011) in the first round to 35.9% (22,988) in the last one. Rescreening rate was very high (88.6% in the fifth round). Positivity rate was superior with the faecal immunochemical test (6.2%) than with the guaiac-based test (0.7%) (p< 0.0001) and detection rates were also better with the immunochemical test. The most significant rise in detection rate was observed for high risk adenoma in men (45.5 per 1,000 screened). Most cancers were diagnosed at an early stage (61.4%) and there was a statistically significant difference between those detected in first or subsequent screening (52.6% and 70.0% respectively; p= 0.024). The availability of these results substantially improves data comparisons and the exchange of experience between screening programmes.-
dc.format.extent10 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19532-
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports, 2016, vol. 6, p. 19532-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep19532-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Binefa, Gemma et al., 2016-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica)-
dc.subject.classificationCàncer colorectal-
dc.subject.classificationIndicadors de salut-
dc.subject.classificationCribratge-
dc.subject.classificationEspanya-
dc.subject.classificationProgrames de prevenció-
dc.subject.otherColorectal cancer-
dc.subject.otherHealth status indicators-
dc.subject.otherMedical screening-
dc.subject.otherSpain-
dc.subject.otherPrevention programs-
dc.titleColorectal cancer screening programme in Spain: results of key performance indicators after five rounds (2000-2012)-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec657482-
dc.date.updated2017-10-31T14:00:12Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid26787510-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica)
Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
657482.pdf645 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons