Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/121244
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDucoing Ruiz, Cristián Arturo-
dc.contributor.authorPeres Cajías, José Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorBadia-Miró, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorBergquist, Ann-Kristin-
dc.contributor.authorContreras, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorRanestad, Kristin-
dc.contributor.authorTorregrosa Hetland, Sara-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-04T07:26:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-04T07:26:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/121244-
dc.description.abstractThe new estimates of the Maddison Project show that GDP per capita ratio at purchasing power parity (ppp) between Bolivia and Finland has changed from 0.68 ca. 1850 to 0.16 in 2015; similarly, that between Chile and Norway from 0.65 to 0.28. The aim of this article is to present a review of the literature and available quantitative evidence to understand how these extreme differences became possible between countries with similarly enormous natural resource endowments. Specifically, the article seeks to: (a) identify some stylized facts that may help understand the divergence between Andean and Nordic countries; (b) identify key historical processes that explain the divergent effect of natural resource abundance in Andean and Nordic economies. In order to achieve these objectives, four topics are covered: GDPpc, population, trade and taxation. The analysis comprises three Nordic countries (Finland, Norway and Sweden) and three Andean countries (Bolivia, Chile and Peru) from the mid-Nineteenth Century to present day. The sample size, time span covered and thematic approach provide new evidence regarding previous work.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040965-
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability, 2018, vol. 10, num. 4, p. 965-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su10040965-
dc.rightscc-by (c) Ducoing, Cristián A. et al., 2018-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Història Econòmica, Institucions, Política i Economia Mundial)-
dc.subject.classificationRecursos naturals-
dc.subject.classificationPolítica industrial-
dc.subject.classificationCreixement econòmic-
dc.subject.classificationBolívia-
dc.subject.classificationXile-
dc.subject.classificationPerú-
dc.subject.otherNatural resources-
dc.subject.otherIndustrial policy-
dc.subject.otherEconomic growth-
dc.subject.otherBolivia-
dc.subject.otherChile-
dc.subject.otherPeru-
dc.titleNatural Resources Curse in the Long Run? Bolivia, Chile and Peru in the Nordic Countries' Mirror-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec679502-
dc.date.updated2018-04-04T07:26:27Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Història Econòmica, Institucions, Política i Economia Mundial)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
679502.pdf490.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons