Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/121682
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLizana, X.-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Sevilla, Asunción-
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorAgustí, Gemma-
dc.contributor.authorRíos Alcolea, Martín-
dc.contributor.authorPiqué i Clusella, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorMarqués Villavecchia, Ana M.-
dc.contributor.authorCodony, Francesc-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-18T13:09:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-31T06:10:22Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-
dc.identifier.issn1438-4639-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2445/121682-
dc.description.abstractBackground Viability quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (v-qPCR) is a recent analytical approach for only detecting live microorganisms by DNA amplification-based methods This approach is based on the use of a reagent that irreversibly fixes dead cells DNA. In this study, we evaluate the utility of v-qPCR versus culture method for Legionellosis risk management. Methods The present study was performed using 116 real samples. Water samples were simultaneously analysed by culture, v-qPCR and qPCR methods. Results were compared by means of a non-parametric test. Results In 11.6% of samples using both methods (culture method and v-qPCR) results were positive, in 50.0% of samples both methods gave rise to negative results. As expected, equivalence between methods was not observed in all cases, as in 32.1% of samples positive results were obtained by v-qPCR and all of them gave rise to negative results by culture. Only in 6.3% of samples, with very low Legionella levels, was culture positive and v-qPCR negative. In 3.5% of samples, overgrowth of other bacteria did not allow performing the culture. When comparing both methods, significant differences between culture and v-qPCR were in the samples belonging to the cooling towers-evaporative condensers group. The v-qPCR method detected greater presence and obtained higher concentrations of Legionella spp. (p < 0.001). Otherwise, no significant differences between methods were found in the rest of the groups. Conclusions The v-qPCR method can be used as a quick tool to evaluate Legionellosis risk, especially in cooling towers-evaporative condensers, where this technique can detect higher levels than culture. The combined interpretation of PCR results along with the ratio of live cells is proposed as a tool for understanding the sample context and estimating the Legionellosis risk potential according to 4 levels of hierarchy.-
dc.format.extent7 p.-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.08.007-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2017, vol. 220, num. 8, p. 1318-1324-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.08.007-
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Urban and Fischer, 2017-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es-
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient)-
dc.subject.classificationLegionel·la-
dc.subject.classificationReacció en cadena de la polimerasa-
dc.subject.classificationADN-
dc.subject.classificationBacteris-
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi de l'aigua-
dc.subject.otherLegionella-
dc.subject.otherPolymerase chain reaction-
dc.subject.otherDNA-
dc.subject.otherBacteria-
dc.subject.otherWater analysis-
dc.titleViability qPCR, a new tool for Legionella risk management-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion-
dc.identifier.idgrec675570-
dc.date.updated2018-04-18T13:09:02Z-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.pmid28882518-
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pagination_IJHEH_13120.pdf707.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons