Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/122207
Title: Introducing automation to the molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection: A comparative study of sample treatments, DNA extraction methods and real-time PCR assays
Author: Abras Feliu, Alba
Ballart Ferrer, J. Cristina
Llovet, Teresa
Roig, Carme
Miguélez Gutiérrez, Cristina
Tebar, Silvia
Berenguer, Pere
Pinazo, Maria-Jesus
Posada, Elizabeth
Gascón i Brustenga, Joaquim
Schijman, Alejandro G.
Gállego Culleré, M. (Montserrat)
Muñoz, Carmen
Keywords: Tripanosoma
Malalties parasitàries
Trypanosoma
Parasitic diseases
Issue Date: 17-Apr-2018
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Abstract: Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become a useful tool for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection. The development of automated DNA extraction methodologies and PCR systems is an important step toward the standardization of protocols in routine diagnosis.To date, there are only two commercially available Real-Time PCR assays for the routine laboratory detection of T. cruzi DNA in clinical samples: TCRUZIDNA.CE (Diagnostic Bioprobes Srl) and RealCycler CHAG (Progenie Molecular). Our aim was to evaluate the RealCycler CHAG assay taking into account the whole process. Methodology/Principal findings: We assessed the usefulness of an automated DNA extraction system based on magnetic particles (EZ1 Virus Mini Kit v2.0, Qiagen) combined with a commercially available Real- Time PCR assay targeting satellite DNA (SatDNA) of T. cruzi (RealCycler CHAG), a methodology used for routine diagnosis in our hospital. It was compared with a well-known strategy combining a commercial DNA isolation kit based on silica columns (High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit, Roche Diagnostics) with an in-house Real-Time PCR targeting SatDNA. The results of the two methodologies were in almost perfect agreement, indicating they can be used interchangeably. However, when variations in protocol factors were applied (sample treatment, extraction method and Real-Time PCR), the results were less convincing. A comprehensive fine-tuning of the whole procedure is the key to successful results. Guanidine EDTA-blood (GEB) samples are not suitable for DNA extraction based on magnetic particles due to inhibition, at least when samples are not processed immediately. Conclusions/Significance: This is the first study to evaluate the RealCycler CHAG assay taking into account the overall process, including three variables (sample treatment, extraction method and Real-Time PCR). Our findings may contribute to the harmonization of protocols between laboratories and to a wider application of Real-Time PCR in molecular diagnostic laboratories associated with health centers.
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195738
It is part of: PLoS One, 2018, vol. 13, num. 4, p. e0195738
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/122207
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195738
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient)
Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
679980.pdf820.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons